What are the Typical Steps in a Tax Court of Canada Appeal?

Most Canadians know about the Tax Court of Canada, but are not aware of the typical steps in a GST/HST appeal proceeding before the Tax Court of Canada. The following is a list of the typical steps in an appeal under the general procedure rules (which is different than an informal procedure appeal - but similar):

1. The Notice of Appeal: The taxpayer (called the Appellant in the appeal) commences an appeal by filing with the Tax Court of Canada a Notice of Appeal and paying the applicable filing fee.  The Tax Court of Canada Rules sets out what must be in a Notice of Appeal.

2. Service of the Notice of Appeal: The Appellant files the Notice of Appeal with the Tax Court of Canada and provides 2 copies of the Notice of Appeal.  If the Appellant would like a stamped copy, they provide three copies.  The Tax Court of Canada serves the Department of Justice (the Department of Justice provides lawyers to Crown Agencies, such as the Canada Revenue Agency and defends the appeal).

3. The Reply: The Department of Justice must file with the Tax Court of Canada the Canada Revenue Agency's reply within 60 days after service of the Notice of Appeal and serve it on the Appellant within 5 days after the 60 day deadline. The Reply must set out information required by the Tax Court of Canada Rules.  Generally speaking, the Reply sets out which facts in the Notice of Appeal that the CRA admits, which facts in the Notice of Appeal that the CRA denies, which facts in the Notice of Appeal that the CRA claims no knowledge and the CRA's facts and assumptions that for the basis of the assessment.

4. The Answer: The Appellant has 30 days after service of the Reply to file with the Tax Court of Canada the Answer.  It is not mandatory to file an Answer. The Answer identifies new facts that must be provided in light of the Reply by the CRA.  The Answer must set out the information required by the Tax Court of Canada Rules.  Generally speaking, the Answer sets out which facts in the Reply that the Appellant admits, which facts in the Reply that the Appellant denies, which facts in the Reply that the Appellant claims no knowledge and additional relevant facts that will be put forth by the Appellant in the proceedings.  If an Appellant does not file an Answer, then he/she/it is deemed to deny all the allegations of fact put forward in the Reply.

5. List of Documents: Both the Appellant and the CRA file and serve a list of relevant documents within 30 days of the close of pleadings. In practice, the exchange of lists of documents may take longer.  The list of documents is a list and not the documents themselves.  Both the Appellant and the Respondent prepare a list of all relevant documents known to the party at the time which may be used in the proceedings as evidence by the party.  Either side may later ask for the production of any document listed. In practice, the Appellant will review the Respondent's List of Documents and ask for the production of documents that are not contained on the Appellant's List of Documents.  The same holds true for the Respondent.

6. Examinations for Discovery: Both the Appellant and the Respondent (the CRA) are entitled to ask questions to discover the what testimony may be provided in the case 9and to attempt to narrow the issues to be decided in the case).  Often the Department of Justice asks to examine the Appellant (if an individual) or the key personnel (if the Appellant is a business entity). Sometimes accountants and advisors are examined. The Appellant may examine the auditor, the CRA's appraiser, an appeals officer or another relevant person. A court reporter records the examination if it is in oral form.  Sometimes the examination may proceed by way of written questions.  The testimony is given under oath.  There is no timeline for the examinations for discovery.

7. Undertakings: During the examination for discovery, a party may not be able to answer a question or a document may be discussed that has not been exchanged.  The examiner will ask for an undertaking for the answer to be provided in writing or a document be provided. A list of Undertakings is exchanged shortly after the examination for discoveries.

8. Motions and Questions Presented to the Court: Sometimes examinations for discovery may be frustrated by refusals to answer questions and legal issues arising. When problems arise in the process, they are generally dealt with my a motion to the Tax Court.

9. Hearing Date Application: The Appellant and the Respondent jointly apply for a hearing date to be set after the examination for discoveries and the satisfaction of undertakings has occurred. The parties must indicate the number of days that will be required for the hearing,  In practice, the parties discuss lists of witnesses and a litigation plan is created by the Appellant's counsel. Calculating the number of days required for a hearing is not a science, but the litigation plan helps.

10. Pre-hearing Conference and Pre-Hearing Conference Brief:  After the hearing date has been set, the Tax Court of Canada may set a pre-hearing conference date (or the parties may apply to the Tax Court for a pre-hearing conference).  A judge will preside over the pre-hearing conference, but that judge will not ultimately hear the case. The purpose of the pre-hearing conference is to narrow the issues.Often the pre-hearing conference judge will give a first impression of the evidence and this may lead to a settlement because the weaknesses of the case are discussed. The Appellant provides a short Pre-Hearing Conference Brief in connection with the pre-hearing conference setting out the issues, the Appellant's theory of the case and propositions of law to be relied upon at the hearing. Where the parties have requested more than three days for the hearing, the Court may discuss the scheduling of the hearing in order to reduce the number of days needed for the proceeding.

11. Hearing:  This is the big event.  The witnesses testify and the arguments are presented. The Appellant and the Respondent will be required to file documents and books of authorities and detailed arguments prior to the hearing. During this time, settlement discussions may occur.

In addition to the above steps, there may be motions (e.g., the Department of Justice may ask the Court  to strike parts of the Appellant's proceedings, the Appellant may ask the Court  to strike parts of the Respondent's proceedings, either may bring jurisdictional questions to to the court, either may bring a motion to compel production of certain documents, etc) and request examinations of non-parties. Litigation may take many twists and turns.

The Cost of Paid Parking in a PSB Lot Just Became More Expensive In Canada

The 2013 Federal Budget in Canada closed a perceived loophole in respect of GST/HST on parking in a PSB lot.  PSB stands for "public service body" and covers municipalities, governments, universities, public colleges, school authorities, hospital authorities, charities and non-profit organizations (also known as the MUSH sector).

Many of these PSBs offer parking to the public. Anyone who visits a sick child or family/friends in the hospital knows that a hospital offers parking (and it is quite expensive). Many PSBs have structured their offering of paid parking such that they do not remit GST/HST from the amounts collected for such parking. This paid parking was treated as exempt for GST/HST purposes.

The 2013 Federal Budget attempts to even the playing field between commercial paid parking lots (GST/HST taxable) and PSB parking lots (often treated as GST/HST exempt). The 2013 Budget proposal for parking includes the following rules:

Rule 1: If a PSB offers paid parking on a regular basis, it will be subject to GST/HST;

Rule 2: Notwithstanding Rule 1, if a charity (that is not a municipality, university, public college, school or hospital authority) offers parking, it may still be exempt;

Rule 3: If a charity that is also a municipality, university, public college, school or hospital authority, offers paid parking to the public that is supplied by the charity for the municipality, university, public college, school or hospital authority, the paid parking will be subject to GST/HST; and

4) If a PSB offers property and services free of charge or if 90% or more of their supplies are made free of charge, then occasional paid parking (e.g., a special event parking) will not be subject to GST/HST.

There are 2 implementation dates for the new rules.  Paid parking will be subject to GST/HST with respect to supplies made after March 21, 2013. However, Rules 2, 3 and 4 may be applied retroactively to the implementation of GST and/or implementation of HST in a participating province (subject to statutory limitation periods). In other words, the CRA may retroactively assess PSBs in respect to their supplies of paid parking in certain cases.

These changes have been developed by the CRA to close a perceived loophole in the legislation.  The Department of Finance has included the proposed amendments in the 2013 Ways & Means that accompany the 2013 Budget.  There are paid parking suppliers that the CRA is targeting with the proposed retroactive amendments.  Regardless of whether a particular PSB is being targeted, they must quickly restructure their parking related activities because the effective date.

If You Use Zapper Software, You May Shocked By New GST/HST AMPs

The March 21, 2013 Federal Budget in Canada announced new administrative monetary penalties (AMPs) and criminal offences under the Excise Tax Act (Canada) for:

(1) the use of  Electronic Suppression of Sales (ESS) software;

(2) the possession or acquisition of ESS software; and/or

(3) the manufacture, development, sale, possession for sale, offer for sale or otherwise making available ESS software.

ESS software is also known as "zapper" software because it hides sales transactions, thereby allowing vendors to under-state sales and evade payment of GST/HST and income taxes. This has been a hot audit topic for a number of years and the Department of Finance is giving the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) new tools to rid Canada of zapper software.

The AMPS penalties will shock the vendors who use ESS software or possess or acquire ESS software.  Vendors who use ESS software may be assessed an AMPs penalty in the amount of $5,000 for the first infraction and $50,000 on any subsequent infraction.  Vendors who possess or acquire ESS software may be assessed an AMPs penalty in the amount of $5,000 for the first infraction and $50,000 on any subsequent infraction.  These two AMPs penalties go hand-in-hand because a vendor who acquires or possesses ESS software is also likely to use it.  Both AMPs penalties can be imposed against the same vendor.  Also, if the CRA issues a first level AMPs penalty, it will also require the ESS software to be removed from the computer.  If ESS software is subsequently discovered in a new audit, it is likely second level AMPs will be imposed.  It may be possible that the CRA will interpret the AMPs penalties on a per transaction basis because the penalties may be imposed on a per infraction basis.

Businesses that manufacture, develop, sell, possess for sale, offer for sale or otherwise make available ESS software for sale will receive higher voltage AMPs.  The AMPS penalty for a first infraction is $10,000 and $100,000 for any subsequent infraction.  This AMPs penalty aims to end the supply of ESS software in Canada.

There is a limited due diligence defense available for vendors who acquire and possess ESS software and businesses that manufacture, develop, sell, possess for sale, offer for sale or otherwise make available ESS software for sale.  The due diligence defence will generally require a person to show that exercised the degree of care, diligence and skill to prevent the contravention with respect to ESS software that a reasonably prudent person would have used in comparable circumstances.  There may be cases where the person has attempted to ensure that they do not have ESS software and it has been installed on their computers. There may be a bug in a computer program that disrupts the sales records, but it was not intended.

In addition to the AMPs penalties, businesses that manufacture, develop, sell, possess for sale, offer for sale or otherwise make available ESS software for sale may also be subject to criminal sanctions.  The potential fines are as low as $10,000 (in addition to the AMPs penalties) and as high as $1,000,000 and/or imprisonment of up to 5 years or both.

These new AMPs penalties and criminal sanctions will take effect January 1, 2014.  Given the time before implementation, it may be prudent to spend money on an IT check-up (it will likely cost less than a first level AMP).

Candian Sales Tax Rates Chart (As at April 1, 2013)

Canadian Sales Tax Rates Chart
As at March 1, 2013

 

Province/Territory

Provincial Sales Tax

GST/HST Rate

GST Included in PST Tax Base

Combined Rate

British Columbia

7%

5%

No

12%

Alberta

Nil

5%

N/A

5%

Saskatchewan

5%

5%

No

10%

Manitoba

7%

5%

No

12%

Ontario

N/A

13%

N/A

13%

Quebec

N/A

14.975%

N/A

14.975%

New Brunswick

N/A

13%

N/A

13%

Nova Scotia

N/A

15%

N/A

15%

Newfoundland/Labrador

N/A

13%

N/A

13%

Prince Edward Island

N/A

14%

No

14%

Northwest Territories

Nil

5%

N/A

5%

Yukon

Nil

5%

N/A

5%

Nunavut

Nil

5%

N/A

5%


 

The Divorce is Official: British Columbia Is A Single Stage Sales Tax Province Again

1005 days ago, the British Columbia and federal sales tax systems joined in a value-added tax union called Harmonized Sales Tax or HST.  It was not long before the strains of the union started to show. It was not a match made in heaven (it was politically motivated - never a good starting point). Some say they was also outside interference in the relationship (Bill Vader Zalm did not wish this union to succeed).  With the outcome of the 2011 referendum, separation was certain.  In the months following the referendum, the steps to legally separate have been undertaken. On April 1, 2013, the divorce has become official. British Columbia sales tax has returned to being a single staged sales tax (a retail sales tax).

1005 days is not particularly long - but it is not as short as some Hollywood marriages:

  • Kim Kardashian's and Kris Humphries' marriage lasted 72 days (but the divorce proceedings are taking time - so, technically the marriage may last for longer than the HST - TBD);
  • Britney Spears' and Jason Alexander's marriage lasted only 55 hours;
  • Pamela Anderson's and Cris Rock's lasted 102 days; and
  • Elisabeth Taylor's and Conrad "Nicky" Hilton's marriage lasted 9 months.

Elizabeth Taylor married 8 times (twice to Richard Burton and the second marriage was 16 months after the couple divorced) - so their is hope that after a passage of time, another attempt at a harmonized sales tax in British Columbia may transpire.

This love/hate relationship will continue for some time. Chapters of this story are yet to be written - check back from time to time.

MUSH Sector Rebate Rates (As at April 1, 2013)

A registrant/non-registrant for GST/HST purposes which makes exempt supplies will not be entitled to claim input tax credits (unless the entity also makes taxable supplies). Some entities are not entitled to claim any rebates of the GST/HST paid on business inputs.  The MUSH sector may or may not be entitled to claim a rebate depending on the province in which the entity is located.

I have promised to share my MUSH sector rebate chart.This chart highlights many important problems for the MUSH sector. 

MUSH 

Sector Entities

GST Portion 

Rebate

HST Portion Rebate - Ontario

HST Portion Rebate - Quebec

HST Portion Rebate - BC

HST Portion Rebate - NS

HST Portion Rebate - NB

HST Portion Rebate - Nfld

HST Portion Rebate - PEI

Municipalities

100%

78%

 

0%

0%

57.14%

57.14%

No rebate

No rebate

Hospitals

83%

87%

51.5%

0%

83%

No rebate

No rebate

No rebate

Facility Operators

83%

87%

51.5%

0%

50%

50%

No rebate

No rebate

School Authorities

68%

93%

47%

0%

68%

No rebate

No rebate

No rebate

Universities & Public Colleges

67%

78%

 

47%

0%

67%

No rebate

No rebate

No rebate

Charities

50%

82%

50%

0%

50%

50%

50%

35%

Qualifying Not-for-Profits

50%

82%

 

50%

0%

50%

50%

50%

 

35%

1. The lack of significant rebates for hospitals in Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland/Labrador and New Brunswick will put a strain on provincial budgets due to the unrecoverable health care costs.

2. The lack of significant rebates for school authorities and universities and colleges in Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland/Labrador and New Brunswick will put a strain on provincial budgets due to the unrecoverable education costs.

3. Nova Scotia was able to relieve some of its budget pressures when it signed a CITCA.

4, British Columbia has de-harmonized and for that reason the provincial portion is shown as 0%.

5. For Ontario, the effective unrecoverable GST/HST rates (what the entity will not be able to recover by way of a rebate) in respect of purchases for use in exempt activities are:

MUSH Sector Entity Effective GST/HST Rate after Rebate
Municipalities 1.76%
Hospitals 1.89%
School Authorities 2.16%
Universities and Colleges 3.41%
Charities 3.94%
Qualifying Not-For-Profits 3.94%

 

Canadian Lawyers May Need The BC PST "Application For Clearance" Re Transactions Closing After April 1, 2013

When a business sells its assets by way for a sale in bulk (or the Bulk Sales Act applies), it does not do so in the normal course of its business.  Usually, one of the preconditions to closing a transaction (one of the vendor closing documents in an asset purchase) is a certification from the provincial sales tax authorities to the vendor that all provincial sales taxes have been paid or arrangement have been made by the vendor to pay the taxes. The vendor provides this certification to the purchaser.  When this certification is provided, the provincial sales tax authorities cannot pursue the purchaser for the unpaid provincial sales taxes of the vendor.  When this certification is not obtained, the provincial sales tax authorities may pursue the purchaser for the unpaid sales taxes of the vendor.

If an asset purchase transaction involves or includes assets located in British Columbia on the closing date, it may be necessary to obtain a clearance certificate from British Columbia.

The BC Ministry of Finance released FIN 447 "Application for Certification" on March 28, 2013.  Vendors use this form to submit their application for a certificate.  It may be completed to cover provincial sales taxes and other provincial indirect/commodity taxes (such as tobacco tax, motor fuel tax, carbon tax, social service tax, and hotel room tax).

What is most interesting about this form is that the lawyers for the purchaser may file the form (previously, the lawyers for the vendor were the the party who requested the clearance certificate and could not control the delivery).  While the vendor (person whose tax records are to be searched) must sign the form giving authorization for the search, the purchaser may be the submitter of the form and the party receiving the information.

Everybody's Working For the Week-End (in BC)

April 1, 2013 is only 3 days away - so, everybody in British Columbia is working Easter week-end to get ready. The government bureaucrats are working hard releasing publications on returning to British Columbia provincial sales tax (BC PST). Business owners are busy reading the new publications and making systems changes to ensure compliance by Monday morning at midnight.

On March 28, 2013, the following forms and publications were released:

 

Why Are There So Many Tax Changes Coming Into Effect April 1?

There are many tax changes coming into effect on April 1 of each year.  Is it an April Fool's joke? No - the Government of Canada's year end is March 31 (the fiscal year runs April 1 - March 31).  The same holds true for the provinces. Tax changes are often implemented to start at the beginning of the government's new fiscal year.

This is why British Columbia de-harmonization occurs on April 1, 2013 and it is no longer an HST participating province.  Prince Edward Island becomes an HST participating province on April 1, 2013. The Government of Quebec must start to pay HST on its purchases starting on April 1, 2013 (did not start on the January 1, 2013 harmonization date). Many of the measures in the 2013 Budget take effect either budget day or April 1.

This is why so many government budgets are released in the month of March every year. Even the provinces implement many changes to taxes on April 1.  For example, the government of Ontario (via Ontario Tire Stewardship) is implementing increases (and decreases) on April 1, 2013. Ontario Electronics Stewardship Fees change on May 1, 2013 (for something a little different).

Hidden In 2013 Budget Is A Potential Problem For Businesses

On March 21, 2013, the Government of Canada tabled the 2013 Budget.  GST/HST does not receive much attention. One of the sleeper issues is the new authority given to the Canada Revenue Agency to withhold GST/HST refunds claimed by businesses if certain information is not provided to the CRA.

The Notice of Ways and Means contains the following:

Section 229 of the [Excise Tax Act] is amended by adding the following after subsection (2):

(2.1) The Ministry is not required to pay a net tax refund under subsection (1) to a person that is a registrant unless the Minister is satisfied that all information, that is contact information or that relates to the identification and business activities of the person, to be given by the person on the application for registration made by the person under section 240 has been provided and is accurate."

This provision has been added based on net refund frauds that have occurred.  In the past, a small number of people have incorporated companies, obtained a GST/HST number, applied for a net refund (to which they were not entitled), received a refund cheque, and disappeared before the CRA knew they had been scammed.  There are serial offenders who have done this over and over again and this takes taxpayer money out of the system.  This is wrong and it needed to be stopped.

However, the powers given to the Minister/CRA (drafted by the CRA for the Department of Finance) are very broad.  A CRA auditor can use this power against law abiding businesses too.  That is the concern I am raising. An auditor can say he/she does not believe that the information provided is correct or complete and withhold a needed refund.  The business may provide accurate information and there may be a disagreement.

It is also not clear whether this provision may be utilized by an auditor say 3 years after registration (so you are not dealing with the rogues who create a number of dummy companies to obtain net GST/HST refunds).  Can a net GST/HST refund be withheld in circumstances where the current information is different than the original information provided with the GST/HST registration? If the directors change, Can a GST/HST net refund b withheld because the information is different than on the original form? Can a GST/HST net refund be withheld if the year end changes (even where the CRA is informed of those changes for income tax purposes)? Can a GST/HST net refund be withheld if a business evolves and the product offerings change (such that the original information is not the best answer)? Can a GST/HST net refund be withheld if the estimates of taxable sales is wrong (business is better or worse than what was estimated prior to business activities starting)?

Also, it should be noted that it is not necessary to actually fill out a GST/HST registration application.  The CRA's process has evolved to the point that a corporation is incorporated and a business number is automatically sent in the mail within a few weeks. A director of the business may telephone the CRA to open a GST/HST account without completing a written form and sending it in.

Archives »