Service Providers That Make Presentations May Have to Rethink Venue
There are many types of service providers who make presentations to audiences. Sometimes the audience is the public (e.g., business people who want to learn how to benefit from Facebook). Sometimes the audience is employees a a particular company (e.g., a law firm brings in a marketing guru t talk about business and sales plans, a nursing home operator brings in service providers to lecture bout ways to improve delivery of services, a bank brings in a security expert to talk to employees in a lecture hall, etc.).
The general HST place of supply rules may not apply to these types of transactions. There is a special HST place of supply rule for services in connection with a location specific event.
Section 28 of the New Harmonized Value-added Tax System Regulations provides:
"A supply of a service in relation to a performance, athletic or competitive event, festival, ceremony, conference, or similar event is made in a province if the service is to be performed primarily at the location of the event in the province."
This means that if a service provider makes supplies of such services, they would charge HST at the rate of 13% if the event is held in Ontario (assuming the 50%"primarily" test is satisfied). if a service provider makes supplies of such services, they would charge HST at the rate of 12% if the event is held in British Columbia (assuming the 50%"primarily" test is satisfied). Similarly, if a service provider makes supplies of such services, they would not charge HST (but would charge GST) if the event is held in Alberta, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Manitoba or PEI.
The "primarily" test would be most often applicable if the person providing the service is from a different province than the province in which the event occurs. If an Alberta-based marketing guru gives a presentation in Ontario, it is possible that HST would not apply to his/her speakers fee. Based on my own experience giving presentations, it takes a significant amount of time to prepare the presentation and a short amount of time to deliver a presentation. Based on my experience, out-of-HST province service providers may be able to demonstrate that HST is not applicable on a case-by-case basis. that being said, if a service provider does not charge HST in relation to services provided in an HST province, they should maintain documentation regarding that decision.
I will predict that border cities (that is, cities on the border between an HST province and a non-HST province) will see a decrease in conferences. Many conferences previously held in places like Ottawa will move to alternatives, such as Gatineau, Quebec.
Finally, MUSH sector and exempt businesses will consider venues for corporate events and internal training. if an entity cannot claim full input tax credits and recover HST, if may be less expensive to hold events outside HST provinces. That being said, the travel costs and costs associated with being away from the office might outweigh the HST costs. That being said, if Paradise Island, Nassau, Bahamas offers great deals, we may see more winter/spring events outside HST provinces. That being said, the Canada Revenue Agency might take a close look at taxable employee benefits.
Cyndee Todgham Cherniak is counsel to and in affiliation with the International Trade Law and the Tax Law (Commodity Tax
Cyndee:
As you are undoubtedly aware, Alberta does not subscribe to HST. In Alberta only the 5% GST component of federal Excise Tax Act applies. There is no "added" component of 8% like there is in Ontario - or 7% like there is in BC - or 10% like there is in Nova Scotia.
If a law firm in Alberta provides "federal" tax advice to a client in Ontario and the advice applies equally across Canada, is the Alberta firm obliged to charge the client the Ontario component of HST? If it is not obliged to do so, and does not do so, is the Ontario client obliged to report to whoever that it received valuable services outside Ontario and to accordingly make a remittance to Ontario or whoever? Are Ontario law firms now at a serious competitive disadvantage?
"Federal" tax advice from a law firm is merely a tip of the iceberg example. Apart from law firms, similar question can arise in respect of many other matters (goods and/or services) which are not peculiar to Ontario.
If you have any thoughts, I would like to hear them.
Please be assured that I am not practising law, I have no connection with the Vander Zalm camp in British Columbia, and I am not secretely acting on behalf of any client.
Regardless, the application of HST seems to have many inconsistencies which are not in accordance with Canadian law - particularly the Constitution which includes various ancient British laws embedded in the Constitution.
Cyndee's response - Alberta law firms must follow the HST place of supply rules. As a result, if a client is located in Ontario and the Alberta law firm receives instructions from individuals in Ontario and is hired by the indiviTuals in Ontario, they will have to charge the 8% Ontario PVAT in addition to GST. So, there is no benefit for an Ontario company/taxpayer to go to Alberta to get federal tax advice - that being said, some of my friends in Alberta are really good tax lawyers and provide good advice like Ontario tax lawyers.