Graphic Design Industry in British Columbia Needs Publication to Guide Them Throuh PST Minefield

In the years before Ontario and British Columbia harmonized their provincial sales taxes with the GST, the graphic design industry was under close scrutiny by PST auditors.  Some graphic design services were considered to result in deliverables of tangible personal property (goods) and, therefore, were PST-taxable.  Some graphic design services were accepted by auditors as being purely services and, therefore, not PST-taxable.  In this situation, where some sales are PST-taxable and some sales are PST-non-taxable, the industry is in desperate need of guidance.  As of March 10, 2013, the graphic design industry in British Columbia has not seen a new bulletin or specific guidance for the industry.  This industry in an important industry in Canada and needs guidance.

The Provincial Sales Tax Act does not contain a provision dedicated to graphic designers.  That being said, there are many general provisions of the Provincial Sales Tax Act that apply to graphic designers (including the new provision on bundled services, the software provisions).  However, since the rules for graphic designers are not simply set out in one or two provisions, statutory interpretation is required and consideration of the administrative policies (to the extent there are policies).

The old British Columbia Bulletin SS 128 Graphic Designers may be under re-development and the administrative position may change dramatically.  However, the old bulletin may be a helpful starting point in planning for post-April 1, 2013. When reading the old Bulletin, please remember some of the old underlying statutory provisions have changed.

One of the problems for the graphic design industry is that not all graphic designers do the same thing. There are many categories of graphic designer.  Prior to harmonization in Ontario, I worked with the Association of Registered Graphic Designers to develop charts so that the industry could help the Ontario Ministry of Finance develop its policy.  The charts used to be publicly available to the graphic design industry, but have been removed since they do not apply in an HST world. The categories of graphic designers in the charts for which we explained the phases of a typical project were:

  • Exhibit Design
  • Environmental/Architectural Graphics and Wayfinding Design
  • Editorial Design
  • Identify/Branding
  • Web Design
  • Package Design
  • Advertising Design
  • Corporate Communications

Based on previous experience in Ontario, graphic designers and graphic design firms must start with the question - What is the deliverable?  If the answer is a good (such as business cards, brochures, packaging, promotional materials or a movable display/booth), then the deliverable is taxable and all or some of the services prior to the final deliverable will likely be considered to be PST-taxable.  If the answer is real property (such as wayfinding), then all or some of the services prior to the final deliverable will likely be considered to be not PST-taxable. If the answer is services (such as the development of concept or a logo provided electronically only), then all or some of the services prior to the final deliverable will likely be considered to be not PST-taxable.

To make things more complicated, the interpretations by Ontario and British Columbia would permit a design project to be divided into more than one component.  It was recognized that in any project, there could be a bundle of identifiable PST-taxable deliverables and PST-non-taxable services/intangibles or real property. For example, in most graphic design projects, there is a creative pre-implementation phase that could have non-PST-taxable services (e.g., concept development, creative ideas storming).  Under the previous rules, there needed to a clear point in time when the entire project might end because the graphic design proposals were rejected (e.g., the client did not like any of the logos presented).  Whether or not British Columbia will still permit non-taxable components is yet to be determined - but, would be consistent with their rules with respect to software.

If a graphic designer or graphic design firm does not charge a client PST on the entire contract price, they will have to justify not charging PST.  There is the opportunity to claim a competitive advantage over graphic designers located in Ontario and Quebec who must charge HST on the entire purchase price. If a B.C. graphic designer plans to use the new PST rules to their advantage, it will be important to develop clearly drafted contracts that divide the project into components.  It will also be important to develop other paperwork to document any component of the project where PST is not charged. We would be pleased to help.

British Columbia Residents and Businesses May Have to Self-Assess BC PST on Goods Brought Into the Province

In November 2012, the British Columbia Ministry of Finance issued Bulletin PST-013 "Tangible Personal Property (Goods) Brought Into British Columbia". On February 7, 2013, the British Columbia Ministry of Finance reissued Bulletin PST-013 "Tangible Personal Property (Goods) Brought Into British Columbia".

Self-assessment on goods brought into British Columbia was an issue under the previous social services tax regime - and it is back again with PST.  Individuals who bought goods outside British Columbia were required to self-assess BCSST when they imported the goods into British Columbia (even if the importation was in their luggage or vehicle).  Similarly, individuals from Alberta/Washington State (elsewhere) with chalets in the beautiful British Columbia mountains were required to self-assess BCSST.  These rules return with the implementation of the new and improved BC PST on April 1, 2013.

Some businesses who use imported goods for their own use (and the goods are not exempted) must self-assess BC PST with respect to importations of goods that occur after April 1, 2013.  Under the previous BCSST regime, this was a problem for many businesses.  Often there was documentation issues with respect to inter-provincial transactions because inter-Canada transactions do not require reporting to border officer (as is the case with importations from outside of Canada).

For example, I have a client in the Ontario who has a small branch operation in British Columbia. They load information on laptops in Ontario and train the BC employees on the systems in Ontario.  The employees return to British Columbia with their new computers after the training.  They will need to monitor these transfers as BC PST will be payable.

Another example would be the BC resident who travels to Ontario (or another Canadian province) for a vacation and buys artwork or clothing or other personal items.  Another example is a BC resident who buys a motor home or vehicle or boat in Alberta (or other province) and drives home to British Columbia.  These individuals will be required to self-assess BC PST whether they bring the goods to BC themselves or have the goods shipped to be delivered in BC.

Bulletin PST-013 "Tangible Personal Property (Goods) Brought Into British Columbia contains useful information for individuals about some of the applicable exemptions. However, there are no statutory references or references to the regulations because the publication was prepared prior to the finalizing of the laws.

British Columbia Issues Revised Bulletin for Registering for New BC PST

In December 2012, the British Columbia Ministry of Finance issued Bulletin PST-001 "Registering to Collect Provincial Sales Tax".  On February 26, 2013, the British Columbia Ministry of Finance issued a revised Bulletin PST-001 "Registering to Collect Provincial Sales Tax". Since the British Columbia PST starts on April 1, 2013, businesses need to turn their minds to whether they must register for BC PST purposes. There isn't much time left to you have your number on time and inputted into your compliance systems.

Businesses inside and outside British Columbia that were registered under the old and defunct social services tax regime cannot use their old BCSST number.  They must re-apply for and obtain a new PST registration number.  New businesses that have come into existence after harmonization (and those that existed prior to harmonization) will no longer be permitted to use their GST/HST number with respect to provincial sales tax (they will still use the number to collect and remit GST). These businesses in British Columbia need to register for and obtain a BC PST number.

Many non-resident businesses are also required to obtain a BC PST registration number.  I will leave it to another post to discuss the far-reaching nature of the registration and collection requirements in the new BC legislation.

Registration is possible on-line, in person or by fax.  The on-line registration process appears to be simple.  Please let us know if you have used the electronic registration method and how soon did you get your number.

We would be pleased to speak with non-residents of British Columbia concerning the new registration rules.  The British Columbia government closed gaps in the law (real and perceived) in order to ensure a greater tax base of registered businesses.

Finally the New BC PST Rules: The British Columbia Sales Tax Regulations Signed Into Law

We have been waiting patiently to report on the new (and improved) British Columbia provincial sales tax (de-harmonization) rules.  We are finally able to notify our readers of the regulations.

On February 28, 2013, the Administrator (on behalf of the Lieutentant Governor in Council of the Province of British Columbia) signed the Provincial Sales Tax Regulation and the Provincial Sales Tax Exemption and Refund Regulations. Since the BC PST comes into effect on April 1, 2013, businesses in British Columbia have one month the read the new PST rules and implement them in their systems. This will be quite a feat - especially where the rules are not the same as the previous version of the PST called the social services tax.

These new BC PST rules are the meat and potatoes of the new provincial sales tax.  There is also the Provincial Sales Tax Act (that received Royal Assent in May 2012) and Bill 2 - 2013 "Provincial Sales Tax Transitional Provisions and Amendments Act, 2013" (tabled February 13, 2013 and subject to change before becoming law).

The new BS PST is redesigned to permit changes in the PST without  the support of opposition parties.  Regulations are promulgated by the Lieutenant Governor in Council (the BC Cabinet) and do not need to be tabled in the Legislature for a vote.  As a result, the regulations can be changed by the governing party (with no public or legislative debate) to pursue their tax policy objectives.

Previously, the core rules were in the Act and the complimentary rules were in the regulations. 

Please refer back to The HST Blog for posts on the new BC PST rules.

Canada Revenue Agency Issues Draft Policy On HST Self-Assessment & Seeks Comments

It is unusual for the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to seek public comments on a difficult harmonized sales tax ("HST") topic.  Take advantage of the opportunity to shape their future policy.

On September 9, 2011, the CRA released DRAFT GST/HST Notice 266 "Harmonized Sale Tax - Self-assessment of the provincial part of HST in respect of property and services brought into a participating province".  The deadline for filing comments is October 31, 2011.  This document is 77 pages in length, so it will take time to review and find what will not work in practice.

Financial services providers, financial institutions, multi-jurisdictional charities & non-profit organizations, universities & colleges with campuses in more than one province, long term care home providers operating in more than one province, residential real estate management companies operating in more than one province, doctors and medical professionals or management companies operating in more than one province and other exempt businesses would be affected by this draft policy.  Non-resident companies also should be mindful of the draft policy if they are active in Canada and make exempt supplies.

In addition, even though the HST provinces should realize that they import supplies, they may not think of the HST consequences.  Ontario, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland/Labrador and British Columbia (until they stop being a participating province) should also consider how the policy will affect them.

While the policy is in draft, it will be applied going back to July 1, 2010.  Also, while it is draft now, it will be finalized in the future.  The CRA auditors will consider this policy to be an assessment road map.  Please take the time to make sure it reflects a workable solution.

While it is self-serving for me to say this: Ask a sales tax lawyer for help in reviewing the draft policy and writing your comments.  This is your chance to improve your future and you can save money in the long run if you fix the problems before the policy is engraved in stone.

Continue Reading...

B.C. HST Referendum Fall-Out is Like Changing A Home Renovation Project

I have been asked whether the change back to the old provincial sales tax (called social services tax) in British Columbia will be costly.  My answer has been: What B.C. is going through is like a significant home renovation project.  The owners of the house (the B.C. government) undertook a major renovation and after it was done, were told by the building inspectors (the people) to put it back the way it was originally.  This change costs money and will affect the owners of the house and the goods and services providers (the businesses).

Who is to blame?  The home owners (B.C. government) because they did not seek permission to undertake the renovation.  Instead they begged for foregiveness after the fact and foregiveness was not forthcoming.

For Many Businesses In Ontario, Only The Accounting Departments Knows HST Means More Work

When harmonized sales tax ("HST") was announced to be introduced into Ontario, the McGuinty Government told everyone that the administrative burden for businesses will decrease.  Those who work in the area know the truth - there is more work now than there was before HST.

Big businesses (many of which are not really that big) have a greater administrative burden with HST record keeping and reporting because they recapture certain input tax credits and undertake the calculations very quickly or face late filing penalties. 

Builders of real property experience a greater administrative burden with HST because they must file many different forms for transitional rebates, new housing rebates and the recaptured input tax credits.  What they did not tell builders is that they will have to file separate forms for the GST portion of the rebate and the PVAT portion of the rebate.  Builders also face late filing penalties.

Same holds true for long term care home and retirement home builders who also must file multiple forms to claim the new residential rental property rebates and transitional rebates (separate forms for each for the GST portion and the PVAT portion).  I have spoken with one client who spent hours just trying to determine which forms needed to be filed out.  Some portions of some forms did not need to be completed because there were other forms to complete instead.  My client could not figure out what to do to get the much needed money back and called me.  It even took me a couple of billable hours to create the road map.  Quite frankly, the forms are a bureaucratic mess.  I should also note that after the forms are filed by builders, they are usually audited and valuations are required before the money is paid (often after a year of waiting).

Public sector bodies (municipalities, universities, schools, hospitals, charities, not-for-profits) also have to complete and file separate forms for the GST portion and the PVAT of the public sector body rebate.  In most cases, the percentage of the rebate at the federal level is different than the rate at the provincial (PVAT) level.  If the public sector body (e.g. a charity) operates in more than one province, there are separate calculations because the provincial rebate rates are not harmonized.  Some provinces do not offer all the rebates.

In addition, businesses must collect HST according to the place of supply rules.  Some of these businesses are charging HST on transactions where they did not previously collect provincial sales tax.  This may be because the sales tax base changed or it may be because the transaction involves an HST province.  Prior to HST, there may not have been a nexus between the supplier in the province and after HST the business is a tax collector of HST.

There are many other examples that I could provide.  Many involving having to spend large amounts on legal or accounting advice to make sure 13%/15%/12% mistakes are not made.  Instead of providing more examples where the administrative burden has increased, I will ask you to provide real life examples by making comments.  Please add to the discussion.

What Should B.C. Premier Clark & Minister Falcon Do Now?

British Columbia Premier Christy Clark and Finance Minister Kevin Falcon should act like the Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of a publicly listed corporation.  What would the Chairman and CFO of a publicly listed corporation do if the federal government issued a harmonized sales tax ("HST") assessment for $1.6 Billion?  They would hire the best lawyers in the area of commodity tax and the best litigators to review all relevant documents, all relevant law and see if there is any valid argument to object to paying the assessment.  The Chairman and CFO of a publicly listed corporation would attempt to preserve shareholder value if at all possible. The Chairman and CFO would not give up immediately and write a big cheque without considering all legal options.

Yesterday on the Lang & O'Leary Exchange on CBC, I discussed the need to review carefully the Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreement between Canada and B.C..  Annex C addresses the issue of the transitional payment of $1.599 Billion and what happens if the CITCA is terminated before the 5 year anniversary date.  Sections 9-17 of Annex C are the most relevant to consider.  The key question will be whether British Columbia has committed a "material breach" under the CITCA?

The answer to this question needs to be considered carefully given the fact that the people of British Columbia have spoken in the referendum and the Government of Canada cannot demand the Government of B.C. to ignore the will of the people in the very unique circumstances.  This is not a case where the politicians have unilaterally decided to back out of the CITCA.  In fact, Premier Clark does not want to terminate the CITCA and may hope to try again in the future to implement the HST.  The Government of B.C. has followed the law in holding the referendum and has spent significant resources to educate the public about how they should vote.  How do these facts interact with the CITCA wording?

I am not saying that this is the answer to the $1.599 Billion question.  I am saying that a lot of questions need to be asked of really smart people who are not ex-political aides.  It is time to ask HST lawyers and contracts lawyers and litigators to canvass all the legal arguments.  In the end, the $1.599 Billion may be payable.  Let's not start with that conclusion and give up on asking more questions.

"YES" British Columbia Voters Have Their Say

The British Columbia voters have voted that the Harmonized Sales Tax ("HST") should end and the province should return to imposing a provincial sales tax.  The referendum results show 54% "Yes" to vote out HST.  In other words, the B.C. voters have told the government that they made a mistake in joining the harmonized provinces and they must correct their very costly mistake.

This referendum on tax policy is historic.  The anti-HST group have successfully used the Recall and Initiative Act (British Columbia) to force a referendum on tax policy.  This was a huge undertaking requiring 15% of registered voters in each riding to sign a petition in favour of holding a referendum.  Over 700,000 people signed the petitions in British Columbia. Those signatures needed to be counted and verified.  This was the first success as the hurdle to get to the referendum stage is high (almost, but not quite, insurmountable). Then the referendum resulted in 1.6 million votes being submitted before the deadline on August 5, 2011, which needed to be counted by Elections BC.  Today, the outcome of the referendum is the key success.  The people have successfully voted against the HST sales tax regime. The reasons for individual votes are varied.  Many wanted to send the B.C. Campbell Government a message that they had made a big mistake and must fix the mistake regardless of the cost.  Whether this is right or wrong can be debated by others.

The sun will set in British Columbia tonight and rise again tomorrow morning.  The upcoming change in tax policy will not have radical effects.  British Columbia will continue to be beautiful and  destination for tourists.  Businesses will continue to consider British Columbia to be a gateway to and from Asia.  Businesses will open and close in British Columbia no differently than in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Prince Edward Island and the territories who have not harmonized their sales taxes (to the extent they impose a provincial sales tax). Life will go on and the various arguments raised in the referendum debate will fade away.

British Columbia will undoubtedly have budget issues to resolve in connection with the change to tax policy.  The province was heading in the direction of the HST and now the direction should change in the direction of the previous sales tax regime.  The people will be watching the Clark Government very closely looking for acceptance of the will of the people.

The discussion for days, months and years to come will focus on whether the Recall and Initiative Act should be amended to exclude tax policy.  Should this historic event be repeatable in the area of tax policy?  Does the successful use of the law highlight the flaws in the law? Should the law be fixed? There will always be a segment of society who are negatively affected by a change to tax policy.  When asked whether they would like to pay more tax, people will instinctively say "NO". Is this the lesson to be learned today?

The United States debt debate foreshadows a future where people blessed by democracy will challenge government in terms of tax policy.  The Tea Party's loud and clear message was "No new taxes".  The British Columbia referendum results also are loud and clear.

Governments must listen to the electorate - that is the message that was received today.  The question is: How can the Government listen better and move forward without the overuse of recall legislation in the future?

What Will Happen If The "Yes" Vote Wins In British Columbia?

The most important document to study will be the "hard-to-read" Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreement between British Columbia and the Government of Canada signed in November 2009 (called the CITCA by tax geeks).  The second most important document to read is the amendment letter to the CITCA signed in March 2010.  A review of the original Memorandum of Understanding may also be helpful. There will be other relevant documents that will be made public voluntarily and through access to information requests to the Government of Canada and the Government of British Columbia.  These documents will need to be reviewed carefully to determine the best plan to move forward.

What exactly will happen will happen in response to a "Yes" vote is yet to be determined.  What we know is that many will not like the plan.  The elimination of the Harmonized Sales Tax ("HST") in British Columbia will not happened immediately on August 26, 2011 if the "Yes" (anti-HST) vote is the successful side.  People celebrating at bars and restaurants will see HST on their bills after the announcement.

Businesses will need time to adjust.  This would be fair to the businesses who are, in reality, the tax collectors from the public.  The businesses will need to know what to do and the mechanisms to collect another tax (even if it is the British Columbia social services tax) will have to be put in place.  Businesses throughout Canada and not just British Columbia will need to adjust their record-keeping systems.  As with HST implementation, a change will involve a lot more work than just changing a tax rate in the computer.

Businesses inside and outside British Columbia will also need to register to collect the replacement tax.  The government will need to launch a new education campaign to communicate the obligations on businesses.  Also with the "To Do List', the government will need its own "To Do List", which will include setting a time line, passing legislation, education of the public (and duck as the tomatoes are thrown), hire people in the Consumer Taxation Branch, train the new employees, prepare policies and bulletins, talk with the Federal Government about repayment, enforcement and other process matters, etc.

If the "Yes" vote wins, GST registrants in British Columbia will still be required to charge, collect and remit HST when they sell to an HST province.  They will still be obligated under the Excise Tax Act (Canada) and regulations thereto to file a GST/HST returns in the future.  The HST Place of Supply Rules will still apply to certain transactions.  So, HST will not be elimniated fully under any change plan.

The rules relating to claiming refunds, rebates and credits under the HST tax system will need to be clarified for B.C. businesses.  There is a possibility that there may be a deadline set for amounts a business or consumer is entitled to receive from the Government of Canada.

If the HST is going to be eliminated, businesses who are registered for GST/HST purposes and entitled to claim input tax credits will take the opportunity to purchase goods and services before the change.  Those businesses that will have to pay unrecoverable provincial sales tax after the change may decide to undertake the expenditures at a time when they can recover HST by way of an input tax credit.  Businesses will take prudent steps to save money while the change occurs. 

Consumers, on the other hand, may delay purchases until after the change occurs when they are purchasing an exempt good, real property, intangible property or services that are not subject to provincial sales tax.  This will most negatively affect the real estate market and the service sector.  There will be transition rules for the change that will need to be developed and communicated.

Consumers outside the province of British Columbia may delay purchases of goods from British Columbia until after the change (or at least after the date of the announcement of the plan for the replacement tax).  The place of supply rules may change and give rise to opportunities to save sales tax.

In the meantime, the Government of British Columbia will undoubtedly talk about repayment of the monies received from the Government of Canada to implement the HST.  There will be talk of new taxes that were not in place in British Columbia before July 1, 2010.  As sure as night follows day, if the "yes" vote is the majority, the blame game will start.

We will continue to watch and report on this developing story - if it develops into a story.  Nothing much will happen if the "No" vote is the majority.

Would You Like To Get On The HST Bandwidth Wagon?

The Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") is looking at the characterization of telecommunication services provided by non-traditional means (such as Voice over Internet Protocol).  Which HST place of supply rule applies depends on the characterization.  What is important to know if that if the CRA does not have all the answers yet (which, it does not), you may not be charging HST properly if you do not ask them.

The CRA has already received a few advance ruling requests.  The CRA has indicated that they are looking at 4 different requests that deal with VoIP services:

  • supplies of VoIP services by a non-resident supplier where the communications are initiated outside Canada, but received in Canada;
  • supplies of VoIP service calling plans for a flat fee;
  • supplies of VoIP services provided where the communication are initiated in Canada, but received outside Canada; and
  • supplies of VoIP services provided by a non-resident where the communications are initiated and received outside Canada, but routed through a server located in Canada.

If you have similar questions, it may be wise to request an advance GST/HST ruling from the CRA.  It may take time (possibly years) before the CRA issues a policy statement based on the rulings it provides.  It also may take months or years for the CRA to publish the rulings it gives to those who have asked.  If you would like to receive your own binding ruling (that may be handed to a CRA auditor when they visit a supplier or a recipient of VoIP services), you will need to submit your own ruling request.

The great benefit of GST/HST ruling requests is that it demonstrates due diligence in the event that the CRA disagrees with you in the end.  Acts that count as "due diligence" can relive a director from a director's liability claim.

The HST Place of Supply Rules for Conferences May Not Apply to Sponsorships

Many associations hold their conferences or meetings in Canada and/or HST provinces (Ontario, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland/Labrador).  For example, the American Bar Association recently hosted their annual meeting in Toronto, Ontario.  I was asked whether a sponsorship by a U.S.-based law firm would be subject to harmonized sales tax ("HST").

The answer is "It all depends".  There are two HST place of supply rules that need to be considered.  In section 28 of Part I of the New Harmonized Value-Added Tax System Regulations, there is a specific rule for "location specific events" (like a conference).  For this rule to apply, there must be a direct connection between the service being performed (e.g. the service of giving recognition) by the supplier and the event (e.g., the conference).

Depending on what exact services are being provided in return for the sponsorship, the Canada Revenue Agency may not consider the connection to be direct.  An example of an indirect service is advertising services (such as including the firm's name in promotional materials).  If this is the case, the general place of supply rule would apply and not the specific rule relating to location specific events.  The general place of supply rules for services is found in section 13 of Part I of the New Harmonized Value-Added Tax System Regulations.

In the example given, the U.S. law firm (if it does not have any offices in Canada) would not receive a service in an HST province.  As a result, HST would not apply to the consideration paid for the sponsorship. 

If the U.S. law firm had offices in the united States and an office in Canada, an analysis of the location "most closely connected with the supply" would be required.

If the U.S. law firm received admission tickets to the event as part of the sponsorship package, it may be that the CRA would consider that the supplier provided a multiple supply and a portion of the consideration paid would be subject to HST.

For more information, please contact Cyndee Todgham Cherniak, a sales tax lawyer in Ontario at 416-760-8999.

B.C. Referendum Is Around The Corner & Polls Say "Bye Bye HST in B.C."

The Globe & Mail is reporting in an article entitled "B.C. HST 'fix' not enough to save tax in referendum: poll" that an Ipsos-Reid poll released June 12, 2011 says 54% of decided voters will vote against keeping the HST in British Columbia.

If British Columbia backs out of the Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreement with the federal government, there will be consequences under that agreement.  Most importantly, British Columbia will have to pay back the two installments (will be three installments are July 1, 2011) of the implementation monies. Businesses will have to change their tax systems again -- to what? It is too soon to tell.

Will B.C. walk away from HST?  We will have to watch for the referendum results.  Could B.C. use the referendum results to negotiate a better HST deal with Ottawa? Maybe (I would try that).  Could B.C. convince the people to accept a revised HST deal after the referendum?  That one will be tricky.  Will a "NO HST" referendum result complicate things for B.C. businesses? Yes - and that is why businesses are coming out in support of HST.

Will B.C. revert back to the social services tax regime?  I am not sure.  However, if I was to bet on an outcome ... it would be that if the "No" vote succeeds, the B.C. government would back out of the HST (the federal sale tax regime under the Excise Tax Act).  The B.C. government would implement the British Columbia sales tax (BCST) under B.C. law that looks a lot like HST (similar to Quebec sales tax in Quebec). British Columbia would enter into an agreement with the federal government to administer BCST (just like with HST).  In other words, things would remain pretty much the same for consumers and businesses.  The difference would be with coordination of changes (just like in Quebec).

I have not talked with anyone in British Columbia about this and do not know what are the actual plans.  What I have written is a guess and nothing more.  Time will tell if it is a good guess.

British Columbia Premier Announces Plans To Reduce BC HST From 7% to 6% to 5%

On May 25, 2011, British Columbia Minister of Finance Falcon announced that the B.C. government will reduce the PVAT rate (B.C. HST) from the current rate of 7% to 6% (July 2012) to 5% (on July 1, 2014).  I am disappointed because Premier Clark was promising a bold announcement.  I was hoping for a list of point of sale exemptions or something more innovative.  Too much hype and not really a fresh approach.

The HST/PVAT rate cannot be reduced before the two year anniversary date by contract with the Government of Canada.  In the Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreement, British Columbia agreed that it would not reduce the HST/PVAT rate for 2 years.  As a result, the first stage of the reductions cannot happen sooner.

Currently, the combined GST/HST rate in Ontario is 13%, in Nova Scotia is 15%, in New Brunswick and Newfoundland/Labrador is 13% and in British Columbia is 12%.  Since Alberta does not have a provincial sales tax, some like to argue that the GST/HST rate in Alberta is 5% (which technically in wrong).  So, it would be technically correct to say that British Columbia would have the lowest GST/HST rate (still) if the changes are implemented.

Here is the "catch", the announcement is that rate will be reduced if the voters in British Columbia vote to keep the HST in the June/July referendum.  The ballots for the HST referendum will be mailed out to B.C. voters on June 13. All ballots must be received by July 22 to be counted.  What they do not say is that the HST/PVAT rate will be reduced to 0% if the referendum is successful (unless Premier Clark goes back on Campbell's promise).

The gamblers in British Columbia need to ask whether they should vote "no" in the referendum against keeping the HST (PVAT).  If they are successful, the rate goes to 0% and they go back to the 5% GST and a retail sales tax.  Or, the no referendum win would allow British Columbia to negotiate a better HST deal with the Government of Canada.  Alternatively, the voters could vote "yes" in favour of keeping the HST and accept limited & staged reductions in the PVAT rate.

Businesses may also have something to say about today's announcement.  The staged reductions require more effort than merely a change to the sales registers and computers.  The positive news for business is that they will have approximately a year to undertake the reductions in their business systems.

HST on Energy and Residential Heating Costs

Ontario retail sales tax ("ORST") was not imposed on electricity and residential heating fuels.  ORST was imposed on "tangible personal property", which was defined in the Retail Sales Tax Act (Ontario) (ORSTA) as "personal property that can be seen, weighed, measured, felt or touched, or that is in any way perceptible to the senses, and includes ... natural gas and manufactured gas." 

To the extent that the following forms of residential heating were captured by the definition of "tangible personal property, the ORSTA contained a specific exclusion to ensure they were not subject to ORST:

  • Gasoline (because it was taxed and remains taxed under the Gasoline Tax Act (Ontario);
  • Fuel (because it was taxed and remains taxed under the Fuel Tax Act (Ontario);
  • Fuel oil (because it was taxed and remains taxed under the Fuel Tax Act (Ontario);
  • Coal;
  • Coke (not the soda pop variety);
  • Wood;
  • Natural gas and manufactured gas (as defined by the Minister);
  • natural water (including ice and steam);
  • Electricity of all purposes; and
  • Ethanol or methanol that is sold and purchased as fuel to generate power by internal combustion.

When HST was implemented in Ontario on July 1, 2010, these exemptions disappeared and the list above became subject to HST.  The increase is tax payable by consumers was the 8% PVAT rate.

What some people do not realize is that the fuel tax and gasoline tax, to the extent it applied before July 1, 2010, continues to apply.  In other words, the amount of tax payable increased because the McGuinty Government did not repeal the Fuel Tax Act or the Gasoline Tax Act.

In addition, HST will apply to services provided by an energy supplier and administrative charges, such as:

  • connection or disconnection of a service or equipment,
  • installations, inspection, testing, maintenance or repairs,\relocation or upgrades of a service or equipment,
  • analysis of the use of an energy product;
  • activation or cancellation of an account,
  • late payments,
  • interest,
  • returned or dishonoured payments,
  • method of payment,
  • account adjustments,
  • account information,
  • franchise fees; and
  • Equipment-related charges, including charges relating to equipment purchased or leased by the person acquiring the energy product.

So, if you are wondering what changed - there you have it.  Premier McGuinty had the option on ensuring that you did not pay more on essentials such as electricity and residential heating - he made a choice not to give consumers a break.  Premier McGuinty and Minister Dwight Duncan had (has) the option in the Comprehensive Integrated Tax Cooperation Agreement (the agreement between Ontario and the Government of Canada re harmonization) to select point of sale rebates (meaning the supplier does not have to collect the PVAT portion of the HST).  McGuinty and Duncan decided Ontarians can and will pay HST on electricity and home heating.

Premier Campbell, who is resigning in part because of HST did agree to a form point of sale rebate (called a Residential Energy Credit) for residential electricity and home heating. Energy products qualifying for the Residential Energy Credit are electricity, natural gas, propane, heating oil (including bio diesel or similar renewable fuel), kerosene, heat and steam.

These are the facts folks ... Please do not shoot the messenger ... use this information instead.

Should Companies/Partners Undertake GST/HST Inspections Before Buying a Business?

Most people hire a home inspector to inspect a home before buying a home.  They hire home inspectors to find the problems that they cannot see so that they do not experience large unexpected expenditures after the closing date.

Should businesses (corporations and partners/joint venturers) hire a GST/HST expert to conduct a GST/HST focused review prior to the closing date so that they do not buy GST/HST problems that a Canada Revenue Agency auditor may blame on the buyer?  What I am referring to is due diligence and a private audit of GST/HST books and records.

A GST/HST inspection is prudent if the buyer is buying the shares of a corporation.  The past errors (liabilities) are acquired in a share purchase transaction.  If you find a serious problem with the GST/HST compliance, then a purchase price reduction can be discussed.  The purchase price reduction for the shares may be quantified by way of a pre-closing voluntary disclosure - but that may delay the transaction.  If you do not want to delay the closing of the transaction, an amount of the purchase price may be put in a reserve or escrow account as the voluntary disclosure proceeds.  It is not necessary to conduct a a voluntary disclosure and reserves can be maintained depending what is found in and quantified during the GST/HST inspection.

Similarly, a GST/HST inspection is prudent if the buyer is purchasing a partnership unit or joint venture interest in an existing partnership or joint venture. As discussed with corporations, the buyer would be buying the GST/HST history and the existing problems.

Even if the acquisition is an asset transaction, a GST/HST inspection is prudent.  If the buyer is making offers of employment to existing employees, they will continue to make any mistakes they had been making in their record keeping and reportings. If you would like to stop bad practices, you need to know they exist and take positive steps to teach proper practices.

GST/HST inspections are not usual - yet.  With the implementation of GST/HST in Ontario and British Columbia, the cost of mistakes increased to 13% and 12% respectively, plus additional basis points for interest and penalties.  Depending on the value of the business that is being acquired, there is more money at stake than the cost of replacing a leaky roof or old furnace.

Tip: Service Providers Must Make HST Place of Supply Determination of an Invoice-by-Invoice Basis

Service providers should not make a determination of the place of supply for harmonized sales tax (HST) and applicable HST rate once at the beginning and not revist the analysis.  As a technical matter, the legislation requires that service providers make a determination for each billing period because the relevant facts may change from invoice to invoice.  For example, the types of services may change from billing period to billing period, which could affect the application of the HST place of supply rules.  If there is more than one office or home address provided by the client, the location most closely connected with the supply may change from invoice to invoice.

The advice is do not follow the Ronco advice "Set It and Forget It".  Canada Revenue Agency auditors are being trained to look into the details of each invoice and look at changes.

MUSH Sector Rebates

This Post is out-of-date

A registrant/non-registrant for GST/HST purposes which makes exempt supplies will not be entitled to claim input tax credits (unless the entity also makes taxable supplies). Some entities are not entitled to claim any rebates of the GST/HST paid on business inputs.  The MUSH sector may or may not be entitled to claim a rebate depending on the province in which the entity is located.

I have promised to share my MUSH sector rebate chart.

MUSH Sector Entities GST Portion  Rebate HST Portion Rebate - Ontario HST Portion Rebate - BC HST Portion Rebate - NS HST Portion Rebate - NB HST Portion Rebate - Nfld
Municipalities 100% 78% 75% 57.14% 57.14% No rebate
Hospitals 83% 87% 58% 83% No rebate No rebate
School Authorities 68% 93% 87% 68% No rebate No rebate
Universities & Colleges 67% 78% 75% 67% No rebate No rebate
Charities 50% 82% 57% 50% 50% 50%
Qualifying Not-for-Profits 50% 82% 57% 50% 50% 50%

This chart highlights many important problems for the MUSH sector. 

1. The lack of significant rebates for hospitals in British Columbia, Newfoundland/Labrador and New Brunswick will put a strain on provincial budgets due to the unrecoverable health care costs.

2. The lack of significant rebates for school authorities and universities and colleges in Newfoundland/Labrador and New Brunswick will put a strain on provincial budgets due to the unrecoverable education costs.

3. Nova Scotia was able to relieve some of its budget pressures when it signed a CITCA.

4. For Ontario, the effective unrecoverable GST/HST rates (what the entity will not be able to recover by way of a rebate) in respect of purchases for use in exempt activities are:

MUSH Sector Entity Effective GST/HST Rate after Rebate
Municipalities 1.76%
Hospitals 1.89%
School Authorities 2.16%
Universities and Colleges 3.41%
Charities 3.94%
Qualifying Not-For-Profits 3.94%

4. For British Columbia, the effective unrecoverable GST/HST rates (what the entity will not be able to recover by way of a rebate) in respect of purchases for use in exempt activities are:

MUSH Sector Entity Effective GST/HST Rate after Rebate
Municipalities 1.75%
Hospitals 3.79%
School Authorities 2.51%
Universities and Colleges 3.40%
Charities 5.51%
Qualifying Not-For-Profits 5.51%

 

A Thought About GST and Imports

Since the implementation of harmonized sales tax ("HST") in Ontario and British Columbia, the Government of Canada should re-think the imposition of goods and services tax ("GST") on imports of commercial goods. In connection with the implementation of HST, the CITCAs include provisions such that HST is not imposed on imported commercial goods.  What is the logic of continuing to impose GST on commercial imports? Wouldn't it be better for Canadian businesses and, in particular manufacturers, if the GST cash flow cost on imported commercial goods is removed?  If the Canada Border Services Agency can live with the HST regime for imports, why can't they also live with no GST on commercial goods and GST on non-commercial goods?  Wouldn't it be a more efficient use of government resources if the Canada Border Services Agency is no longer responsible for collection of GST on imported commercial goods and is not longer shares verification/audit functions with the Canada Revenue Agency?  For that matter, wouldn't it be better for businesses if they did not have to be subject to GST audits/compliance verifications by two separate government agencies who do not adequately share information and interpretations?  I am just saying ...

Premier Campbell Will Face B.C. Liberal Leadership Review

On September 5, 2010, Michael Smyth of The Province wrote an article entitled "Party insider wants Campbell gone" in which the call for Premier Campbell's resignation by Scott Nelson is discussed.  I picked up on something else in the article - there will be a B.C. Liberal convention in November 2010 and a secret ballot regarding Campbell's leadership.

This is interesting in light of the strong opposition to harmonized sales tax (HST).  The Campbell government is facing potential recall campaigns or a referendum on HST.  The British Columbia Supreme Court has heard a judicial review of the procedure followed/not followed in implementing HST in British Columbia.  Based on my experience, it is easy to dismiss a judicial review application from the bench and it takes longer to write a reasoned decision (in favour of the petitioner or the respondent).  There is a democratic uprising that continues to move forward.

It is possible that Premier Campbell will be at the receiving end of more calls for his resignation. It is possible that the leadership review will not be favourable to Premier Campbell.  It is possible Premier Campbell will be succeeded by someone who does not want to carry the HST baggage into the next election.  The conditions in British Columbia are such that the continuation of HST in that province is unpredictable.  That being said, I would be willing to place a bet on the end to HST in British Columbia.

I should let readers know that I studied history at university before admission to law school.  The current Canadian events in British Columbia in the context of HST are fascinating - when will it become history?

Would Ending HST in British Columbia Be Easy?

On August 29, 2010, CTV Calgary posted an article written by the Canadian Press entitled "Repealing HST possible; but expensive: expert".  I, Cyndee Todgham Cherniak, was one of the experts quoted in the article.

I actually think that the expense of repealing/reversing/ending harmonized sales tax (HST) in British Columbia is somewhat overstated in the article.  The federal government could treat any monies paid under the CITCA and amendment (less than $1 Billion at this time) as a pre-payment of other monies over as transfer payments.  So, it is not that British Columbia would have to find approximately $1 Billion in the provincial bank account and write a big cheque.  It may be that the Province would receive a smaller cheque from the Federal Government than what was hoped or expected as a transfer payment.

So, in a sense, ending HST in BC would be easy.  But, that is too simplistic because businesses would be affected by the change.  In the sense that businesses must implement changes in their record keeping to return to the previous sales tax regime, ending HST is not something that should occur overnight.  It would not be wise to announce that HST is ending and BC social services tax is restarting - on the date of the announcement. 

It would be wise for Premier Campbell to pick a date in the future that allows a reasonable adjustment time. That being said, if the B.C. Supreme Court issues its decision in the judicial review on the constitutionality of the implementation of HST in B.C. and finds that a required procedural step was not taken, the court would not be able to ignore its finding on unconstitutionality and grant the province authority to continue to permit the unconstitutional tax to be collected.

What this means is that the Premier is playing with fire by not settling the judicial review (so that a decision is not issued) and not agreeing to end HST.  Premier Campbell could settle the judicial review and agree with the Petitioner for a reasonable time-table for the unwinding of HST in British Columbia.  The Premier may also wait for the court's decision in the judicial review and, if unsuccessful, file an appeal.  But, imaging what the people of British Columbia would say if the court says the HST is imposed unconstitutionally and the Premier does not look out for their interests?

I have said many times that what is happening in British Columbia will be in the history books someday.  I just do not know what will be the story.

HST and Disbursements

Disbursements have been an issue under the goods and services tax (GST) and will become a more complex issue with harmonized sales tax (HST).  When I speak about disbursements, I am talking additional charges or expenses incurred by the service providers, such as parking, filing fees, photocopies, etc. that are billed to the client with the fees for services.

As a general rule, disbursements take on the same GST/HST character as the underlying supply of services.

In 2004, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)  reissued Policy Statement P-209R "Lawyer's Disbursements" and indicated that they took the position that there are two categories of disbursements that may be found on a lawyer's bill:

1) Expenses/disbursements incurred by the lawyer as agent for the client; and

2) Expenses/disbursements not incurred as agent for the client.

The expenses/disbursements incurred as agent may be passed on to the client without additional GST/HST (however, the service provider should not take an input tax credit and then not charge GST/HST as the GST/HST should be passed to the recipient).

The same two categories apply to other service providers.  However, depending on the nature of the services, it may be that for other service providers expenses are not normally incurred in the context of an agency.  As a result, it is important to understand the CRA's administrative position:

The phrase “incurred as agent” indicates that the disbursement described is generally incurred in a lawyer's capacity as agent for a particular client. As such, no GST/HST is exigible on the subsequent reimbursement by the client. The phrase “not incurred as agent” indicates that the disbursement described is generally incurred otherwise than in a lawyer's capacity as agent for a particular client. As such, GST/HST is exigible on the subsequent reimbursement by the client (to the extent that GST/HST is exigible on the consideration for the service provided by the lawyer to the client). The characterization of each disbursement is based on the application of the principles of agency to a typical transaction involving that disbursement.Policy statement P-182R, Agency was used as the basis for this analysis.

In 2010, there have been two important court cases that provide additional guidance on the issue of disbursements (Merchant Law Group v The President of the Canada Revenue Agency (FCA); Roberge Transport Inc. v. The Queen (TCC).  Both cases give guidance that a court will consider as relevant whether the parties had an agency agreement (or some statement concerning the expenses being incurred as agent) in place to support the arguments that the expenses where incurred in the context of an agency. The Roberge Transport case is important to review because it is written by Justice Steven D'Arcy, who was one of the leading GST lawyers in the country before joining the bench in 2009.

Service providers, therefore, should follow the existing policy statement and add what may be taken from the cases.

There are many complex situations where the HST treatment of disbursements will become relevant.

Example 1:  A service provider pays a filing fee to a municipality in circumstances where the filing fee is exempt for GST/HST purposes.   The service provider may be required to charge HST when it bills the disbursement when the service provider is not an agent for the client.

Example 2: A service provider in an HST province (e.g. Ontario) retains a service provider on a sub-contract basis in a non-HST province (e.g., Manitoba) and pays the service provider's invoice and includes the disbursement on the Ontario service provider's invoice to the client.

Example 3: A trucking company providers trucking services to a Canadian manufacturer and incurs inter-provincial fuel taxes that it invoices the client as a disbursement. If the trucking company is not acting as an agent, there may be HST on the incurred taxes depending on the facts.

The answers re whether HST must be charged in respect of a particular disbursement will depend upon the facts.  I can tell you that businesses need more clarification regarding this subject.

My best advice is to read the Policy Statement on "Agency" and "Lawyer's Disbursements" and clearly state in retainer letters and contracts which expenses and disbursements will be incurred as agent for the client.  The list will depend on the business activities and usual disbursements.  You should seek help compiling the "Incurred as Agent" listing.

In addition, it is better to be consistent in your approach to billing disbursements. A billing policy is helpful and should be provided to all sales and billing staff.  Arguments will have greater persuasive value if it can be shown that a particular type of expense is always treated in a certain manner (usually as incurred as agent in order to not charge GST/HST).

Can You Hear Us Now?: British Columbia's Chief Elections Officer Upholds Peoples' Petition Against HST

On August 11, 2010, British Columbia's Chief Elections Officer announced that the anti-HST petition met the requirements of the Recall and Initiative Act. More than 700,000 B.C. voters signed the anti-HST petition.  The determination that the petition meets the signatures criteria sets the stage for a new vote on the implementation HST by the B.C. legislature or a possible referendum. This is and will continue to be a historic example of voter engagement and government accountability.

It is the first time a petition has been upheld since Canada’s only law allowing such petitions was enacted in B.C. in 1995.  While this is an important milestone, the future of the HST in British Columbia remains uncertain.  The Chief Elections Officer said that he will not do anything until a court case against the petition is dealt with in the courts. So, the HST is not dead yet.

Former Premier Bill Vander Zalm and the leader of the anti-HST movement made a very important observation:

“Every Liberal MLA is vulnerable as of today ... We will recall every MLA, every Liberal MLA if need be."

This observation (which may come across to some as a passing statement) is so important because it addresses the fundamental issue of accountability.  What Vander Zalm is saying is that each Liberal MLA who was elected in the 2009 election in the province will be held accountable before the next election.  MLAs are elected by the people and are not given a license to do whatever they please - especially impose new taxes on the people without the approval of the people.

While it is true that most government matters are left by the people to the elected MLAs, there are situations, such as the implementation of the HST, which cause the people to respond and ask for a reconsideration of a proposed action to be taken or action taken by government.  The anti-HST petition is one of those rare situations.

Should all provinces have similar legislation to the Recall and Initiative Act?  Arguably, the answer is "YES".  Arguably, there needs to be mechanism for the people to hold up a big "STOP" sign and ask the government to listen to opposition.  The elected officials should not turn to the voters who elected them and say they are smarter than the voters and they know what is best for the voter and that the voter should "SHUT UP".  If the elected officials will not voluntarily listen to a large number of people, such recall legislation is a check and balance on democratic principles.

I think I hear Bill Vander Zalm saying "Can you hear us now?"

Gratuities as Added Consideration For the Supply

I was at an event last night hosted by Women's Post and a woman entrepreneur in the audience who was in the events planning business in Ontario asked why harmonized sales tax (HST) was charged being charged on gratuities (she had noticed this since the implementation of HST).  She noticed that venues and caterers were quoting (1) the charge for the room and/or (2)  the food/beverages and (3) a mandatory gratuity and that HST was being charged on all charges, including the gratuity.

The answer is that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) considers the mandatory gratuity to be extra consideration for the supply (say, of the venue.food/beverages/etc) rather than a contribution towards the salary (non-taxable) of the employees that will be working the event. The CRA had taken this position with the goods and services tax (GST).  GST/HST is payable on the consideration for the supply and since the gratuity is considered by the CRA to be additional consideration, it goes into the calculation/formula.  As a result, the CRA takes the position that GST/HST is payable on the added consideration that is the gratuity portion.

I have seen the same analysis used by CRA when they look at gratuities paid on restaurant meals, resort vacation packages, hair salon services, spa services, etc - whenever there is a mandatory gratuity OR when the gratuity is included in credit card payment (that is the recipient pays adds a gratuity to a credit card payment).  For example, when I go to the hair salon, I pay by VISA.  Before I indicate my PIN number when I use my chip card, I am asked whether I wish to add a tip or gratuity and I usually add 15%-20% of the tax-excluded price for the services rendered.  The CRA when auditing such service providers/venues, adds the gratuity amounts to the consideration for the services and calculates the GST/HST owing.

Based on the cases I have seen, often the service provider does not charge the GST/HST on the gratuity portion and has to dip into their pockets to pay a substantial assessment.

The morale of the story is that when possible, recipients should give waitresses/waiters and service providers cash tips when they are adding an amount to the bill for the exceptions services performed by the individual to the recipient.  If the gratuities are in the invoices or in the credit card payments 13/113 of the amount in Ontario (12/112 in BC, 15/115 in NS, 113/113 in Nfld/Lab. and NB) will not go to the waitress/service provider and will be remitted to the Receiver General of Canada.  This is unfortunate because the individuals affected are making low hourly wages and rely on the gratuities as employment income (to make ends meet).

I have been involved in structuring the payments so that more money goes to the real people who work very hard for the additional employment income - it is possible if a business plans in advance of the CRA visit.

Cascading Taxes: When Is HST Payable In Addition To/Including Another Tax?

A tax on a tax is called a "cascading tax".  Cascading taxes are common in today's world.  As a general rule, most new taxes and levies can result in cascading tax (HST charged on top of the new tax) unless the provincial government asks the federal cabinet to list the new tax in a regulation.

Goods and services tax (GST) and harmonized sales tax (if applicable) (HST) is calculated on the consideration payable for a supply of property or services.  Subsection 154(2) of the Excise Tax Act (Canada) provides that "the consideration for a supply of property or a service includes:

(a) any tax, duty or fee imposed under an Act of Parliament [that means federal laws] that is payable by the recipient or payable or collectible by the supplier, in respect of that supply or in respect of the production, importation, consumption or use of the property or service [other than GST/HST];

(b) any provincial levy [intended to cover provincial laws] that is payable by the recipient or payable or collectible by the supplier, in respect of that supply or in respect of the consumption or use of the property or service, other than a prescribed provincial levy that is payable by the recipient [that means it is in a regulation]; and

(c) any other amount that is collectible by the supplier under an Act of the legislature of any province and that is equal to, or is collectible on account of or in lieu of, a provincial levy, except where the amount is payable by the recipient and the provincial levy is a prescribed levy."

The term "provincial levy" is defined to mean "a tax, duty or fee imposed under an Act of the legislature of a province in respect of the supply, consumption or use of the property  or a service."  What is most significant about this definition is that unless the levy is imposed pursuant to an Act of the legislature of the province, GST/HST would not be payable on the tax-included price. It is always necessary to go to the source of the taxation/fee/levy.

The Taxes, Duties and Fees (GST/HST) Regulations contain a negative list of provincial levies that are excluded from the GST/HST calculation.  If the provincial law is not in the list, then the provincial levy is included in the price for the purposes of calculating GST/HST.

Ontario has a very short list including the following:

  • the Land Transfer Tax Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.6,
  • Chapter 760 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, made under Part X of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 11, Sched. A, if the tax, duty or fee would have applied to that transfer under that chapter as it read on February 1, 2008

The Taxes, Duties and Fees (GST/HST) Regulations also prescribe in the list "a tax imposed by the legislature of a province, under an Act referred to in the definition of "general sales tax rate", which includes subsection 2(1) of the Retail Sales Tax Act (Ontario). This exclusion is more complicated, but has been generally applied to exclude Ontario retail sales tax from the calculation of GST.

Now that Ontario has harmonized and is not using the Retail Sales Tax Act to impose taxes representing significant revenue, any new provincial levy may be included in the GST/HST calculation as it would not be listed by the Taxes, Duties and Fees (GST/HST) Regulations.  I say "may" because the other requirements in section 154 of the Excise Tax Act would have to be met. To be excluded from the GST/HST calculation, new taxes must fall within a listed Act in the manner it is identified or the provincial government must ask the Government of Canada (specifically federal cabinet) to change the regulation.

It seems as if in most situations, suppliers assume (and act as if) the tax/fee is included in the calculation of GST/HST because it is the safe thing to do.  However, questions are not asked if this is correct.   For every provincial levy or charge that we might be inclined to include for the purposes of calculating GST/HST, we must ask questions before including the fee in the calculation:

  • Is the tax/fee imposed pursuant to a law of Canada?
  • Is the tax/fee imposed pursuant to an Act of the legislature of a province?
  • Is the tax/fee imposed by a regulation or a rule and there isn't a charging provision in an Act of the legislature (I an thinking carefully about the ecotaxes)?
  • Is the tax/fee imposed under a municipal by-law?
  • On what is the tax/fee imposed?
  • Is a recipient of a supply responsible for paying the tax/fee under the law imposing the tax/fee?
  • Is the supplier of the supply required to collect the tax/fee?

I have serious questions whether the Toronto plastic bag fee is subject to HST.  I have serious questions whether GST/HST should have been charged on top of the ecotaxes.  I have questions whether certain destination marketing fees are subject to GST/HST.  I think that consumers are paying GST/HST on top of many taxes and fees when the GST/HST laws do not require GST/HST to be charged.

The unfortunate reality is that the implementation of HST has incentivized Ontario and British Columbia to cause prices to increase so that they get more HST revenues.  It is in the interest of the government for retailers and suppliers to make mistakes and overcharge consumers.  It is no longer in the interest of Ontario and British Columbia to list new provincial levies in the Taxes, Duties and Fees (GST/HST) Regulations.  It is no longer in the interests of the leaders to keep prices down for consumers.

For this reason, it is more important than ever for businesses and retailers to understand the law and force the governments to follow the law.  It is more important than ever before that provincial levies are imposed in a transparent manner.  It is more important than ever for the people to make it known that there is a cascading tax and the government is accountable to them and needs to request the new tax to be listed.

Continue Reading...

File Opening Forms May Provide Useful Information to Auditors

I am a big fan of anticipating a problem during a Canada Revenue Agency audit and solving the problem before it happens.  File opening forms may provide useful information to a CRA auditor.  The first thing they do is they inform the CRA auditor that you are diligent.  You took your GST/HST compliance responsibilities seriously.  You tried to ask the right questions in order to bill correctly.

A file opening form can be useful in recording the information that will allow you to determine whether the harmonized sales tax (HST) place of supply rules apply and at what rate you should be charging HST.

There isn't a single form that will work for all businesses - in other words, you would be wise to work with an HST lawyer or expert to develop the form and learn how to analyze the information on the form in a diligent manner.  If you have a billing policy, then you are more likely to get the answer right.

Some of the information that may be included on a file opening form (and I want to make it clear that this is not an all inclusive list) is:

  1. Date
  2. The correct legal name of the client/customer
  3. If the client is incorporated, the jurisdiction of the corporation and the incorporation number
  4. If the client is a partnership, the jurisdiction of the partnership and the partnership registration number
  5. The head office address or the address at which the individuals are located who provide instructions to you
  6. Name of the prime contact who will be giving instructions
  7. The normal location of that person
  8. Telephone number of the prime contact
  9. Fax number of the prime contact
  10. Email address of the prime contact
  11. If different than 6, the name of the person who hired you
  12. If different than 7, the normal location of the person who hired you
  13. If different than 8, the telephone number of the person who hired you
  14. Will you be providing (a) goods, (b) services, (c) real property, (4) intangible property, or (e) other
  15. A short statement of the proposed work
  16. If you are selling goods, the address to which goods will be shipped
  17. If you are providing services in respect of real property, the address at which you will be providing the services or the location of real property at issue
  18. Your client's/customer's GST/HST registration number

We would be willing to create a special file opening form for your business (for a fee to be determined based on the work involved - e.g., simple business would be $250 plus all applicable taxes).  We will ask more detailed questions about your business and add prompts for information that you will need to apply the HST place of supply rules (and ward away assessments).  We will teach you how to read the information so that you can charge the right amount of HST given your unique circumstances.  To prepare upfront, at the time of file opening, will in all likelihood be less expensive than a CRA assessment.

For more information, please contact me at 416-760-8999.  I am a Canadian sales tax lawyer.

HST = Haveto Sum Together

I have been asked many times over the last few days about reporting of harmonized sales tax (HST) on GST/HST returns.  One question was posed by a retailer who sells paintings across Canada.  He said that in the month of July (so far) he has sold paintings (and delivered the paintings in Ontario, British Columbia and Nova Scotia.  He has asked how he must report the GST/HST to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) on his GST/HST return.

My response is that he must add all the GST and HST together and report the combined amount on a single line of his GST/HST return.  I will give an example to help explain:

This is an example that I have made up and does not use the numbers I have been given by any person.  Let's assume we are already at the end of July for the purposes of my example.  The painter sold the following paintings, to the following destinations, and has collected the following amounts of GST and HST:

Painting Destination Value GST Collected HST Collected
Painting 1 British Columbia $10,000 $500 $700
Painting 2 Ontario $20,000 $1000 $1,600
Painting 3 Ontario $10,000 $500 $800
Painting 4 Alberta $30,000 $1,500 0
Painting 5 Nova Scotia $10,000 $500 $1000

The amount of GST/HST that must be reported on a single line on the painter's GST/HST return will be $8,100.  For reporting purposes, it will make no difference how many sales were made in each HST province.  The total combined GST/HST is reported on as a single number.  Believe it or not (agree or not), the governments thought that this approach would be easier and a basis for selling the HST to businesses as a simple tax.

Many ask at this point how each province gets their respective HST.  The payments to provinces go into a big pot of money and are allocated according to complicated formulas in the Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreements (CITCAs)  I will not bore you with the details.

One final point is that the supplier's records must be auditable.  The CRA auditor will know the combined total and will ask how that number was determined.  The details remain relevant and suppliers should keep records that are easy for the auditors (and then the audits are less painful for the suppliers).

Businesses that Sell Goods Must Charge HST Based on Delivery

I have been asked many times over the last few days questions about the HST place of supply rules for goods. 

  • Does a retailer in Alberta have to charge HST (Ontario rate) on goods sold to a Ontario resident?

Answer: Yes

  • Does a wholesaler in Ontario have to charge HST (Ontario) on goods shipped to Quebec?

Answer: No

The HST place of supply rules for goods is:  HST is applicable to tangible personal property (goods) if the goods are delivered by the supplier (seller) to the recipient (buyer) in an HST province.

For the purposes of the HST place of supply rules for goods, property (a good) is deemed to be delivered in a particular province (e.g., Ontario) by a supplier (seller) and is deemed not to be delivered in any other province by the supplier (seller) if the supplier (seller):

(a) ships the property to a destination in the particular province (e.g. Ontario) that is specified in the contract for carriage of the property or transfers possession of the property to a common carrier or consignee that the supplier has retained on behalf of the recipient (buyer) to ship the property to such destination; or

(b) sends the property (good) by mail or courier to an address in the particular province (e.g., Ontario).

This means that:

  • If an individual comes into a retail store in Ontario and purchases a widget and the retailer gives the widget to the buyer in the store, GST/HST is payable at the combined rate of 13%.
  • If an individual goes into a store in British Columbia and buys a coat and asks the retailer to ship the coat to Ontario, GST/HST is payable at the combined rate of 13%.
  • If an individual goes into a store in British Columbia and buys a coat and takes the coat with him/her, GST/HST is payable at the combined rate of 12%.
  • If an person buys a painting from an artist in Alberta and has the painter ship the painting to Nova Scotia, GST/HST is payable at the rate of 15%.
  • If an Ontario based wholesales/distributor sells goods to a retailer in Quebec and ships the goods to Quebec, GST is payable at the rate of 5%.
  • If an Ontario based wholesales/distributor sells goods to a retailer in Quebec and the retailer sends his own truck to pick up the goods, GST/HST is payable at the rate of 13% because the goods were delivered on Ontario and could be given to another person in Ontario.

B.C. Anti-HST Group Files Court Challenge

On July 5, 2010, an group led by Bill Vander Zalm filed a judicial review with the Supreme Court of British Columbia to challenge the Liberal Government's actions to implement the HST.  The two main orders sought are:

1. An order in the nature of certiorari quashing the Order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council No. 661, dated November 30, 2009, and approval given therein to the Minister of Finance to enter into the Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreement with the Government of Canada; and

2. A declaration that the Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of British Columbia dated November 30, 2009 is of no force or effect and a nullity.

In simple terms, the orders, if granted by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, would undo/remove certain procedural steps that have led to the HST implementation and could cause all HST house of cards to fall.

I have read a copy of the Petition to the Court and find that it raises serious procedural issues.  The most interesting points are raised in paragraphs 10-11, 16 & 18 of the Petition:

10. On November 30, 2009, the Lieutenant Governor in Council, by Order in Council 691 made pursuant to s. 4 of the Ministry of Intergovernmental Relations Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 303, purported to give authority to the Minister of Finance to enter into the Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreement with the Government of Canada (the "CITC Agreement").

11. In the CITC Agreement, the Government of British Columbia agreed, subject to the requisite legislative approvals, to the imposition and implementation of PVAT in British Columbia.  The CITC Agreement purports to authorize the Government of Canada to introduce the necessary legislative amendments to include British Columbia as a participating province under Part IX of the Excise Tax Act. The parties agreed that the PVAT would be implemented in British Columbia on July 1, 2010.

16. The British Columbia Legislature did not purport, in the Consumption tax Rebate and transition Act, to ratify the CITC Agreement, authorize the Minister of Finance to enter into the CITC Agreement or otherwise approve the PVAT for British Columbia.

18. The British Columbia has not ratified the British Columbia CITC Agreement.

In simple terms, the B.C. Liberal Government did not take the formal procedural steps required to approve the cornerstone CITC Agreement. 

In addition, the B.C. Liberal Government did not that the legally and constitutionally required steps. Part 3 of the Petition sets out the laws that were not followed.  This is the part of the case that will be fascinating for legal historians and constitutional law observers.  The case will look into the well known principle of law associated with the Boston Tea Party  - "No taxation without representation".

What is argued to be a fatal flaw of the HST implementation in British Columbia is "[t]he CITC Agreement did not originate in the [B.C.] Legislature, and has not been ratified or approved by the Legislature..."  Taxation of the people was not done properly.

The questions raised in the Petition are important ones for the people of British Columbia and businesses.  While businesses may be concerned that Mr. Vander Zalm may be correct and their input tax credits may be taken away, my humble view is that the case has been brought quickly and the answer will be provided relatively quickly [even though Mr. Joseph Arvay, Q.C. has voiced hope that the case will be head by August 1, 2010, judicial proceedings take time and appeals lengthen the process].  Businesses will be better off if the judicial review decision is quick - rather than having the issue raised and determined 10 years from now after a large assessment of a single taxpayer.  If 10 years of tax collection and filing GST/HST returns is reversed 10 years from now, the retroactive uncertainty and ramifications will be worse for businesses.

The implementation of HST in British Columbia is major tax reform that was rushed to meet the July 1, 2010 date.  If the Mr. Vander Zalm is correct (and I think he is raising very important points and he is knowledgeable in government procedures), he is doing the right thing for the citizens of British Columbia by asking for a judicial review of the government's procedural steps and constitutional and legal authority to implement the HST. 

HST and Actors/Actresses - Will HST Cause Actors/Actresses to Avoid Canada?

More actors and actresses are concerned that Ontario's and British Columbia's decisions to implement harmonized sales tax (HST) will affect them --- and they should be concerned.  If they do not consider the issue of HST, the cost may be 13% of the contract in Ontario or 12% in British Columbia.  Since an actor/actress may make millions of dollars filming a movie in Canada, we are not talking about small numbers.

Subsection 143(1) of the Excise Tax Act (Canada) provides that:

For the purposes of this Part, a supply of personal property or a service made in Canada by a non-resident person shall be deemed to be made outside Canada, unless
(a) the supply is made in the course of a business carried on in Canada;
(b) at the time the supply is made, the person is registered under Subdivision d of Division V; or
(c) the supply is the supply of an admission in respect of a place of amusement, a seminar, an activity or an event where the non-resident person did not acquire the admission from another person.

If this provision applies, then an actor/actress would not have to register for GST/HST purposes and would not have to charge collect and remit GST/HST on their services performed in Canada.

On the other hand, subsection 240(1) of the Excise Tax Act (Canada) is the provision relating to registration and provides that:

"Every person who makes a taxable supply in Canada in the course of a commercial activity engaged in by the person in Canada is required to be registered for the purposes of this Part, except where
(a) the person is a small supplier;
(b) the only commercial activity of the person is the making of supplies of real property by way of sale otherwise than in the course of a business; or
(c) the person is a non-resident person who does not carry on any business in Canada."

If a person must register for GST/HST purposes, they must charge, collect and remit GST/HST (if applicable) in respect of services performed in Canada (and a participating province).

Assuming that the actor/actress is a non-resident of Canada, the key question is whether they are "carrying on business" in Canada.  There is no definition of "carrying on business in Canada" in the Excise Tax Act.  As a result, whether a particular actor/actress is carrying on business in Canada will depend on the specific facts.  There are many factors specific to the work/life of the actor/actress, their background and their activities in a year that may cause the Canada Revenue Agency (Canada's IRS) (the "CRA) to conclude he/she is carrying on business in Canada as opposed to carrying on business outside Canada and visiting Canada (briefly) in connection with that outside business.

The CRA has issued a policy statement concerning the factors they consider when determining whether a person is carrying on business in Canada --- but none of the examples relates to actors/actresses. Policy Statement P-051R "Carrying on Business in Canada" was last updated in 2005.

It is important to note that getting GST/HST correct may mean that the actor/actress (or their production company) would charge GST/HST on the portion of their services performed in Canada and the payor would recover that GST/HST by way of an input tax credit.  If they do not ask the question, it may result in auditors, assessments and a bad & costly experience.

It is important to note that the GST/HST test is not connected to a permanent establishment in Canada like the Canada-United States Income Tax Treaty. In other words, an individual may not have to pay Canadian income tax and may be entitled to register for GST/HST purposes and charge GST/HST on a contract for services.

Canadian commodity tax lawyers can help apply the CRA's "carrying on business" test and provide opinions that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.

New Canada Revenue Agency Guides Help With New Housing Rebate Calculations

Tomorrow Is The Last Pre-HST Day, Do You Have Any Purchases to Make

Tomorrow is June 30, 2010, the last day before the sales tax world in Ontario and British Columbia changes.  Today you should ask yourself, CAN I MAKE A PURCHASE AND SAVE HST.

Consumers will be thinking about saving HST. The question that needs to be asked is what is not subject to Ontario retail sales tax, but will be subject to HST.  I cannot provide an all-inclusive list.  However, here are a few suggestions on what you might buy today:

  • land survey (I am doing this today believe it or not)
  • landscaping services
  • house cleaning services
  • painting services
  • if you sign an agreement of purchase and sale of a previously lived-in home, you may save the real estate commission
  • if you take possession and title of a newly built home before July 1, 2010, you save the HST
  • hair dressing/colouring services
  • manicure/pedicure
  • massage
  • dry cleaning
  • taking Rover to the vet
  • visiting the dentist for teeth whitening (not on my list - sorry Dr Jay)
  • ask a lawyer to draft a will or a pre-nuptial agreement
  • buy a domain name (is your name taken yet?)
  • fill up your home heating fuel tank
  • propane for the summer barbeque
  • clean the swimming pool
  • one last pre-HST Botox injection
  • one last work-out at the gym
  • energy-efficient home appliances are exempt from ORST
  • bicycles are exempt from ORST
  • custom computer software is exempt from ORST
  • subscription to Cosmo, Oprah, Mike Holmes or any magazine that interests you
  • notice in the newspaper about a garage sale, birth notice, death notice, in memoriam, etc.
  • ticket to see a play in a small local theater
  • ticket to a dinner theater
  • pre-paid funeral expenses/deposit on final resting place

What is on your list?

I will be writing another post tomorrow on the purchases that businesses have been waiting to make in order to save the unrecoverable ORST and recover HST by way of input tax credit.

Have You Picked "The Chosen One" in Accounts Payable?

One risk-management step that is often over-looked in a time of sales tax reform is selecting "The Chosen One" in accounts payable who is tasked with reviewing all incoming invoices to ensure that suppliers are properly charging sales taxes. 

When auditors arrive with their spreadsheets in hand, they conduct a (1) purchase side audit and (2) a sales side audit. During the purchase side audit, the auditor reviews a sample of incoming invoices to ensure that the business under audit has paid the right amount of sales tax on its business inputs.  Where a supplier to the business does not charge retail sales tax (ORST) or goods and services tax (GST), the auditor will assess the purchaser business - as it is allowed to do under the law.

Businesses can control this assessment risk by assigning the task of reviewing incoming invoices to a trained person - "The Chosen One".  This accounts payable employee will review each incoming invoice and either seek corrections from the supplier or make arrangements to self-assess the tax that is applicable, but not charged.

With the start of harmonized sales tax (HST) in the provinces of Ontario and British Columbia, this is a perfect time to ensure that someone is actively reviewing incoming invoices.  First, you will want to make sure that suppliers are no longer charging ORST on invoices for goods and services provided after June 30, 2010.  If a supplier still shows ORST or PST (provincial sales tax) or RST (retail sales tax) as being charged on the invoice, you will want to follow-up and ask for a revised invoice.  It must be clear that ORST/PST/RST is not being charged.  It may be that HST is being charged, but it must be clear so that an auditor is not confused.

On that point, HST is supposed to be a single combined tax.  The vendor is not supposed to separate the charges into GST and HST on the invoice (except where the supplies are subject to the recaptured ITC rules).  As a result, in Ontario, the invoice should identify 13% HST and no 5% GST and 8% HST separately.

In addition, "The Chosen One" should review incoming invoices to ensure that HST is being charged where applicable.  As a result , you will need to determine when you must pay HST (not just when you must charge HST).  You will have to understand the HST place of supply rules as they apply to purchases.

Businesses outside the HST Zone will also have to have "The Chosen One" selected and briefed on the HST place of supply rules.  You should expect to see some invoices arriving from the HST Zone that will automatically charge HST at the applicable provincial rate of the supplier because that will be the safe default position.  Communication will be important after the implementation of HST to correct these types of errors.  When in doubt regarding the application of HST, the purchaser may obtain an advance ruling from the GST/HST Directorate of the Canada Border Services Agency.

Finally, non-residents of Canada that purchase goods/property and/or services from Canadian businesses also need to have "The Chosen One".  Many Canadian businesses have adjusted their billing systems with the implementation of HST.  There will be situations where previously zero-rated supplies (GST charged at 0%) will default in the computer systems to 12%, 13% or 15% HST depending on the location of the supplier.  A quick call to the supplier to notify them of the change would be in order so that the computer errors can be corrected.

Continue Reading...

Tip: 3 Days Left in Pre-HST World: Do Some File Cleaning

Today is June 28, 2010 and there are only three more days left in pre-HST Ontario/BC.  Those in the service industry (where files are maintained for clients) should bill for services rendered before July 1, 2010.  Services rendered before July 1, 2010 are not subject to harmonized sales tax ("HST").  In addition, many services are not subject to Ontario retail sales tax ("ORST") - only "taxable services" as defined in the Retail Sales Tax Act (Ontario) are subject to ORST in Ontario.

I offer this advice to help not confuse an auditor - close any dormant files on Monday-Wednesday  (June 28-30, 2010) (pre-HST period).  Send those files to records (and you will not have to pay HST on the service fee of the moving company if the service is performed before July 1).  Hire a temporary worker to provide assistance in the pre-HST period and save the HST.  Both GST and HST are payable of the services provided by temporary employees services.  If your employee (that is, he or she is on your payroll and is not a third party service provider or employed by a third party service provider) provides the assistance in closing the files in the computerized system and putting the files in boxes, then his/her employment related services are not subject to wither GST/HST.

You will both clean your office and save the HST at the same time.  More importantly, you will have documentation to show that the files were closed prior to HST.  You will have additional proof to give an auditor that you took steps to make a clear division for the purposes of the application of the HST transition rules. The easier you make it for the auditor, the easier you make it for yourself.

In addition, if that client comes back and needs more work performed by you post-HST, you can open a new file, gather the new information for your HST decision tree and start fresh (and start charging HST where applicable).

Service Providers That Make Presentations May Have to Rethink Venue

There are many types of service providers who make presentations to audiences.  Sometimes the audience is the public (e.g., business people who want to learn how to benefit from Facebook). Sometimes the audience is employees a a particular company (e.g., a law firm brings in a marketing guru t talk about business and sales plans, a nursing home operator brings in service providers to lecture bout ways to improve delivery of services, a bank brings in a security expert to talk to employees in a lecture hall, etc.).

The general HST place of supply rules may not apply to these types of transactions.  There is a special HST place of supply rule for services in connection with a location specific event. 

Section 28 of the New Harmonized Value-added Tax System Regulations provides:

"A supply of a service in relation to a performance, athletic or competitive event, festival, ceremony, conference, or similar event is made  in a province if the service is to be performed primarily at the location of the event in the province."

This means that if a service provider makes supplies of such services, they would charge HST at the rate of 13% if the event is held in Ontario (assuming the  50%"primarily" test is satisfied). if a service provider makes supplies of such services, they would charge HST at the rate of 12% if the event is held in British Columbia (assuming the  50%"primarily" test is satisfied). Similarly, if a service provider makes supplies of such services, they would not charge HST (but would charge GST) if the event is held in Alberta, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Manitoba or PEI.

The "primarily" test would be most often applicable if the person providing the service is from a different province than the province in which the event occurs.  If an Alberta-based marketing guru gives a presentation in Ontario, it is possible that HST would not apply to his/her speakers fee.  Based on my own experience giving presentations, it takes a significant amount of time to prepare the presentation and a short amount of time to deliver a presentation.  Based on my experience, out-of-HST province service providers may be able to demonstrate that HST is not applicable on a case-by-case basis.  that being said, if a service provider does not charge HST in relation to services provided in an HST province, they should maintain documentation regarding that decision.

I will predict that border cities (that is, cities on the border between an HST province and a non-HST province) will see a decrease in conferences.  Many conferences previously held in places like Ottawa will move to alternatives, such as Gatineau, Quebec.

Finally, MUSH sector and exempt businesses will consider venues for corporate events and internal training.  if an entity cannot claim full input tax credits and recover HST, if may be less expensive to hold events outside HST provinces.  That being said, the travel costs and costs associated with being away from the office might outweigh the HST costs.  That being said, if Paradise Island, Nassau, Bahamas offers great deals, we may see more winter/spring events outside HST provinces.  That being said, the Canada Revenue Agency might take a close look at taxable employee benefits.

Canada Border Services Agency Publishes Fact Sheet on HST & Imports

The Canada Border Services Agency has published a Fact Sheet entitled "The Canada Border Services Agency's Implementation of the Ontario and British Columbia Harmonized Sales Tax" (June 2010), which sets out some of information importers should know about HST.

In short, HST will be applied in respect of non-commercial goods (a.k.a things individuals import for personal use).  The "official definition of a "non-commercial good" is: "Non-commercial goods" means "all goods, other than goods imported into Canada for sale, or for any commercial, industrial, occupational, institutional, or other like use."

Beginning July 1, 2010, the importation into Canada of non-commercial goods by or for a consumer that is a resident of Ontario or British Columbia, will be subject to the HST. The HST will apply to non-commercial goods destined for Ontario and British Columbia, regardless of where the goods enter into Canada. NOTE: Goods destined for Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland/Labrador are also subject to HST.

MORE IMPORTANTLY - As is the case today, the provincial component of the HST will not generally apply to commercial goods that are imported by an HST registrant for consumption, use or supply exclusively in the course of the commercial activities of the registrant.

For more information, please see the Fact Sheet.

We Now Have Place of Supply Regulations And More

In the June 9, 2010 Canada Gazette, the final HST place of supply regulations are published as SOR/2010-117 - now called "New Harmonized Value-added Tax System Regulations". Also included in the regulations are the HST anti-avoidance rules (Part 2), the HST transition rules (part 3), repeal of Place of Supply (GST/HST Regulations (Part 4) and application rules (Part 5).

It is about time that the nuts and bolts of the HST law is being made available to businesses in harmonized provinces. However, much is still missing, such as the real property rules and transition rules for builders of residential complexes. 

Ontario Massage Therapists May Learn About HST Consequences From BC

The Winnipeg Press Press (an unlikely resource for HST information) reports in an article entitled "B.C. massage therapists will have to charge HST on chronic disease patients" that massage therapists must charge HST on massage services to chronic pain patients, even if they have a doctor's note and the services are medically necessary. There are many human conditions that require massage therapy as a medical treatment.

The article states:

The NDP says people in B.C. who suffer from chronic diseases and need massage therapy are the latest to be hit by the harmonized sales tax.

Health critic Adrian Dix says massage therapists who treat people with diseases such as multiple sclerosis will have to charge their patients the HST, pushing treatment costs toward $100 an hour.

He says the government is imposing the tax despite warnings from patients and health care professionals that it hurt those needing the treatment for chronic illness.

However, Finance Minister Colin Hansen says a health profession can't be exempted from federal tax unless it's regulated in at least five provinces, and massage therapists are only regulated in three — Ontario, Newfoundland and British Columbia.

He says the government is providing a HST credit for low and modest income people as well as increasing the basic personal amount tax credit.

Meanwhile, organizers of an anti-HST petition say they've now signed up 15 per cent of registered voters in all but five of B.C.'s 85 ridings, five per cent more than the minimum needed for the petition to succeed in getting either a vote in the legislature or a referendum.

This gap in the tax system will cost insurance companies and individuals.  If you have a doctor's note, you may be reimbursed under some health insurance policies for the massage services (but, then again, doctor's may charge you for a note to provide to your insurance company (also subject to HST).  If you do not have insurance coverage for the massage services, then it is a taxable health care costs to individuals (on top of employer health taxes, fair share health levies, insurance premiums, taxes on insurance premiums, etc.).

The good news is that if the massage therapy is provided by a registered nurse, a registered nursing assistant, a licensed or registered practical nurse, it will be exempt from HST.

It is also important to distinguish between massage (which is taxable) and chiropractic services (exempt) and physiotherapy  services (exempt). So, it may be a characterization problem for some chronic pain patients.

The HST is Coming, The HST is Coming

Kevin Marron has written a helpful article about harmonized sales tax in "The Canadian Lawyer" magazine entitled "The HST is Coming, The HST is Coming".  I am not just saying it is a good article because I am quoted in the article.  My good friend, Terry Barnett, is also quoted.

Please note that I will be giving a presentation on HST for lawyers with David Schlessinger of KPMG LLP on June 23, 2010, which is being presented by the Law Society of Upper Canada.  Last I heard, over 283 people have signed up to listen.

Graphic Designers in Ontario/BC Have HST Characterisation of Supply Questions

Graphic Designers have experienced Ontario retail sales tax issues for the last 4-5 years as auditors have taken the position that their services are actually "taxable services".  As a result of the confusion, the Association of Registered Graphic Designers (Ontario) consulted with the Ontario Ministry of Finance and prepared materials for members.  A number of charts/continuums were prepared by the Association to provide to the Ontario Ministry of Finance to demonstrate that there are many different types of graphic design services.  The Association's tools set out information for 8 categories of graphic designers (categories for the purposes of communication with Ontario):

  • exhibit graphic design
  • environmental/architecture graphic design
  • editorial graphic design
  • identity graphic design/branding
  • web design/new media
  • package graphic design
  • advertising graphic design
  • corporate communication/promotional material graphic design

After the creation of these documents, the Ontario Ministry of Revenue released RST Guide 520 "Graphic Designers", in which Ontario recognized and provided guidance regarding the Ontario retail sales tax consequences for various categories of graphic design services.

British Columbia issued SST Bulletin 128 for graphic designers in British Columbia (before the Ontario Guide).

With harmonized sales tax (HST), graphic designers will continue to have serious characterization issues.  The HST place of supply rules are based upon (divided into categories) based on the characterization of the supply.  FOR HST PURPOSES, THERE ARE MANY DIFFERENT PLACE OF SUPPLY RULES THAT MAY APPLY FOR GRAPHIC DESIGNERS BASED ON WHAT TYPE OF GRAPHIC DESIGNER SERVICES/DELIVERABLES THEY PROVIDE.

Some graphic designers would apply the general HST place of supply rules for services.  Some graphic designers would apply the HST place of supply rules for services in respect of real property.  Some graphic designers would apply the HST place of supply rules for services in respect of tangible personal property. Some graphic designers would apply the HST place of supply rules for services in respect of photographic -related goods.  Some graphic designers would apply the HST place of supply rules for computer-related services.  Some graphic designers would apply the HST place of supply rules for intangible property. Some graphic designers would apply the HST place of supply rules for intangible property in respect of real property. Some graphic designers would apply the HST place of supply rules for intangible property in respect of tangible personal property. Some graphic designers may apply a combination of HST place of supply rules.

Any graphic designer in Ontario who does not charge the 13% HST rate in Ontario will have to justify not charging the 8% HST portion.  The same holds true for graphic designers in British Columbia if they do not charge the 7% HST portion.  Yes, both graphic designers in Ontario and British Colombia may compete with U.S.-based graphic designers who are not charging HST. That is another issue altogether. 

Graphic designers who sell only to businesses/clients/consumers in their province will not have place of supply issues as they will charge their provincial are on all invoices.  The graphic designers who have businesses/clients/consumers in more than one province will have to characterize their services/deliverables and apply the correct place of supply rule.  I would be pleased to help.

As at June 5, 2010 the Final HST Place of Supply Rules Have Not Been Promulgated

I have been watching the Department of Finance web-site and, to date, the final version of the HST Place of Supply Rules Regulations have not been promulgated.  We are 25 days away from the implementation date for HST in Ontario and British Columbia and we do not have the final version of the applicable rules.  How is this easier for businesses?  Businesses are the ones who will be assessed by Canada Revenue Agency auditors for mistakes.  It will be an penalty on businesses.

On April 30, 2010, the Department of Finance issued draft Regulations in Respect of the Place of Supply of Property and Services for public comment.

On June 3, 2010, the Canada Revenue Agency reissued its Technical Information Bulletin 103 (June 2010) on "Place of Supply Rules for Determining Whether a Supply is Made in a Province".

Canada Revenue Agency Reissues Revised Technical Information Bulletin 103 Regarding HST Place of Supply Rules

On June 3, 2010, the Canada Revenue Agency reissued a revised version of Technical Information Bulletin 103 "Place of Supply Rules for Determining Whether a Supply is Made in a Province".

This Technical Information Bulletin is 53 pages in length.  It has been updated to reflect changes to the HST place of supply rules in the draft regulations (drafted after the first release of the HST place of supply rules in February 2010). It contains 127 examples to assist businesses.  Some of the examples are helpful and others do not reflect common situations that businesses will experience.  That being said, the Canada Revenue Agency has released a document that all businesses should read as soon as possible.  If a business cannot find the answer in the Technical Information Bulletin, they should seek a ruling from the Canada Revenue Agency.

 

Gift Certificates and Gift Cards and GST/HST

Yesterday, I was asked a question about gift certificates.  A vendor is selling gift certificates in June for use in June 2010 or on or after July 1, 2010.  The question is what happens for GST/HST/ORST purposes when one sells the gift certificate and when one redeems the gift certificate for goods/services.

Before I go too far, it is important to pin-point what I mean when I say "gift certificates" (or rather what the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) thinks is a gift certificate).  In CRA Policy Statement P-202 "Gift Certificates", the CRA states:

A gift certificate is a "device" (e.g. voucher, receipt, ticket) which,

1) has a stated monetary value,

2) can be redeemed on the purchase of property or a service from a particular supplier; that is, the supplier agrees to accept the device as consideration, or a part hereof, in respect of the purchase of property or a service,

3) for which consideration is given in the amount of the stated value, and

4) which has no intrinsic value.

The determination of whether property, which otherwise would qualify as a gift certificate, has an intrinsic value will require a certain degree of judgment on the part of departmental officials applying this policy. Generally, the value inherent in the property will be evident from the circumstances surrounding its sale. If the purchase of the property is promoted as something more than a device which may be used as a partial payment towards a future purchase, the possibility that the property has value in itself, should be examined.

Pursuant to section 181.2 of the Excise Tax Act (Canada) (the "GST/HST Legislation), the issuance or sale of a gift certificate for consideration (e.g., money) shall be deemed not to be a supply and, when given as consideration for a supply of property or a service, the gift certificate shall be deemed to be money. 

This means that when a vendor sells or issues a gift certificate, no GST or HST is payable because the GST/HST Legislation says no supply has occurred.  If there is no supply, there is no event that results in the application of GST/HST. 

HOWEVER, when a person uses that gift certificate to purchase goods and/or services, the gift certificate is money. The redemption of the gift card for goods or services is a supply for GST/HST purposes.  If the supply (e.g., a DVD) is a taxable supply and, therefore GST/HST is collectible, then the gift certificate should be used to pay the purchase price plus GST/HST.  In other words, a the time of the supply that is a purchase of goods and/or services is the moment when the vendor needs to ask about GST/HST consequences and charge the correct amount of GST/HST/

This is important because I also saw a flyer yesterday for the sale of gift cards in June 2010 to save HST.  This flyer was wrong in the context of what was being sold and when. A vendor would collect (let's say $100 in cash) for a $100 gift certificate in June 2010.  When the consumer redeems the gift card for services (or property), the vendor will determine whether to charge GST and/or HST on what is purchased.  If the gift card is redeemed in June 2010, then the vendor would collect GST (and possibly ORST) in respect of the purchase if the supply is in Ontario.  If the gift card is redeemed on or after July 1, 2010, then the vendor would collect GST and HST if the supply in in an HST province.

For example, if the gift card is for a spa treatment (e.g., a manicure), if the services take place in June 2010, the vendor would charge for the manicure ($20) and charge GST ($1).  If the gift card was for $25, the vendor would apply $21 against the gift card and the person could keep the $4 credit for the next visit or could take the cash.

If the manicure takes place in July 2010, then the vendor would charge $20 for the manicure, $1 GST and $1.60 HST (assuming the manicure services were provided to an individual in Ontario).  In July 2010, the vendor would apply the $22.60 against the gift card and the individual would have $2.40 remaining.

Even though there isn't a similar explicit rule for Ontario retail sales tax purposes, Ontario has the following statement on an official web-site:

Consumer Alert – Gift Cards - Retailers Charging Sales Taxes

Retailers must not charge consumers provincial Retail Sales Tax (RST) and/or federal Goods and Services Tax (GST) when buying gift cards.

The Ministry of Consumer Services advises consumers to check their gift card receipts to ensure they are not charged sales taxes when buying gift cards.

Sales taxes should only be applied on goods or services when purchased using the gift card as the payment option.

Based on this official statement, it appears that the position of the province of Ontario is that Ontario retail sales tax is not collectible at the time of a sale or issuance of a gift certificate/gift card.

Ontario Government and BC Government May Not Follow HST Transition Rules & Give Selves Sale Tax Holiday

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has issued GST/HST Info Sheet GI-073 "Ontario and British Columbia: Transition to the Harmonized Sales Tax - Payment of the GST/HST by Ontario and B.C. Government Entities (May 2010) and the examples provided put the government entities in Appendix A outside the HST transition rules. So, I have to warn suppliers to the Appendix A government entities to be careful because CRA auditors may try to apply the transition rules.  I find it funny and sad that the Governments do not follow their own transition rules to save the HST (when businesses and consumers do not get the same breaks).

Example 3 in GI 073 provides as follows:

In may 2010, an Ontario ministry, which is listed on schedule A to the RTA, orders and pays for furniture, but the furniture will not be delivered and ownership will not be transferred to the Ontario ministry until August 2010.  The furniture is acquired in the name of the Province and the Ontario ministry provides a Crown funds exemption request or certification clause to the supplier.

Because the Ontario ministry is listed on Schedule A to the RTA, and the consideration for the supply of the furniture is paid before July 1, 2010, the Ontario ministry will continue to claim an exemption from GST/HST.  Therefore, the supplier does not charge GST/HST on the consideration for the supply of the furniture to the Ontario ministry.  In this case, the supplier may accept the Ontario ministry's Crown funds exemption request or certification clause requesting relief from both the GST and the HST as the consideration for the supply was paid before July 1, 2010.

The HST transition rules applicable to everyone else were released on October 14, 2009. The HST transition rule for tangible personal property (goods) provided that if tangible personal property was purchased after May 1, 2010 and consideration was paid between May 1, 2010 and July 1, 2010 and the tangible personal property was delivered on or after July 1, 2010, HST would be applicable.  To save the HST, the tangible personal property would have to be purchased before May 1, 2010 and the consideration paid before May 1, 2010. As a result, the Ontario and B.C. Governments have beneficial treatment not available to others. 

The other interesting issue relating to Example 3 is that Ontario retail sales tax or B.C. social service tax would be payable if the furniture had been delivered before July 1, 2010.  So, it looks like (according to the CRA's GI-073) the rules applicable to Ontario and B.C. provide the Government entities with a tax holiday between May 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010.  How is that fair?

All I can say is for suppliers to the Ontario Government and BC Government to beware.  This does not seem correct.

Canada's Department of Finance Has Released Financial Institution Rules for the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST)

On May 19, 2010, the federal Department of Finance released "Financial Institution Rules for the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST)", which is a rather long and complicated document. The good news is that only financial institutions (including de minimis financial institutions) must figure out how this document changes their way of doing business and imposes new obligations.  The bad news is that financial institutions may charge higher service fees to cover their compliance costs / assessment risks.

The released document provides information on changes to rules for selected financial institutions (also known as SLFIs).  The changes include changes to the test for determining whether an entity is an SLFI.  As a result, it will be important for entities to apply the new test to see whether they are still SLFIs and whether they are now considered to be a SLFI.  The release states:

British Columbia and Ontario's decision to join the HST, effective July 1, 2010, will significantly increase the number of FIs that are SLFIs. For example, a bank with branches in Ontario and Manitoba and in no other provinces would become an SLFI only as a result of Ontario harmonization.

This statement suggests that some entities (were not considered to be SLFI before and are considered to be a SLFI now) now have a lot of work to do to prepare before July 1, 2010.

The released document also provides information to financial institutions about the "special attribution method" (friendly name "SAM") that they are required to use.  This complicated formula will likely appear in the coming weeks in regulations and, therefore, will not be subject to scrutiny by opposition MPs and the Canadian Senate.

The SAM attribution methods are briefly discussed for:

i. banks

ii. insurance corporations

iii. trust and loan corporations

iv. investment plans and segregated funds

v. other corporations, individuals and trusts

The publication also covers the following topics:

  • information requirements
  • penalties
  • MTFs that are ETFs
  • timing of PVAT (provincial HST component) determination under SAM
  • compliance rules
  • transitional rules for SLFIs re Ontario and BC
  • recapture of ITC rules for SLFIs
  • SLFI transition installment base
  • Imported supplies - non resident trusts
  • SLFI rules respecting deemed pension supplies and pension rebate
  •  

 

Beware: Some Tips to Save HST Are Wrong

On May 12, 2010, the Globe and Mail ran a print article entitled "Tips for cheating the harmonized sales taxman".  Some of the tips provided in the origin version were incorrect and have been removed in the online version.

Printed Version:

Tip 1 "Buy Now, Use Later

Even if you prepay, you still pay HST on services used after July 1.  But products aren't subject to that rule.  So if you know the purchase of some durable product (e.g. washing machine, fall wardrobe, camping gear) is in your near future, buy it before July 1, even if it sits unused.  In fact, since HST adds 8 per cent and you can borrow money at a much lower rate, do this even if you save to take a short term loan to do so."

This advice is INCORRECT.  First, durable goods, including washing machines, fall wardrobes and camping equipment, are subject to Ontario retail sales tax (ORST) at the rate of 8%.  So, if a consumer buys goods before July 1, 2010, they will be paying a combined sales tax rates (GST and ORST) of 13%. Second, the transition rule applies to services and goods.  If you buy a good to be delivered before July 1, 2010, ORST and GST are payable.  If you buy a good before July 1, 2010 and the good is delivered after July 1, 2010, the good will be subject to GST and HST.

Printed Version:

Tip 2 "Get to Know the Internet

Look for retailers in Alberta and other "tax havens". They won't charge you HST or even PST if you have an out-of-their province shipping address.  Even after paying shipping and handling, you'll save money."

This advice is also INCORRECT.  Due to the HST place of supply rules for goods (also known as tangible personal property), a GST registrant in Alberta would be required to charge, collect and remit HST if the goods are shipped to an address in the HST Zone (Ontario, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick or Newfoundland/Labrador).  if you buy goods in Alberta and pay for shipping to Manitoba, you will not be required to pay HST.  However, if you live in Ontario, you will have to pay for someone to ship the goods from Manitoba to Ontario.  This second shipping may wipe out any HST savings.  Further, the transshipment may add risk of loss or damage to the transaction.

Printed Version:

Tip 5 "Get on the Internet

The government has a rebate program and the exempted products and services are many and varied.  You can't adjust your spending until you know where the tax applies and doesn't"

Continue Reading...

What Are The HST Place of Supply Rules For Services

Businesses in the HST Zone (Ontario, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland/Labrador) will have to use the newly released harmonized sales tax (HST) place of supply rules, some of which are different from the existing place of supply rules (for Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland/Labrador). The applicable HST rates are:


• Ontario: 13% (5% GST and 8% provincial HST component)
• British Columbia: 12% (5% GST and 7% provincial HST component)
• Nova Scotia: 15% (5% GST and 10% provincial HST component starting July 1)
• New Brunswick: 13% (5% GST and 8% provincial HST component)
• Newfoundland/Labrador: 13% (5% GST and 8% provincial HST component)


In addition, some businesses outside the HST Zone will be required to charge, collect, and remit HST to Canada’s federal government in accordance with the place of supply rules when the place of supply is within the HST Zone.


On February 25, 2010, Canada's Department of Finance released an administrative document containing its proposed HST place of supply rules which will be used to determine whether a supplier must charge, collect and remit HST in connection with a supply made in Canada and whether a recipient must pay HST in connection with an acquisition or importation and at what rate. The Canada Revenue Agency subsequently issued, simply put, the proposed HST place of supply rules will be used to determine in which province a supply is considered to have occurred for HST purposes.


The HST place of supply rules for services have evolved from the existing rules to reflect the addition of the larger economic provinces of Ontario and British Columbia to the HST Zone.
The first question to ask when applying the HST place of supply rules is: What is being supplied or sold? Is it property (tangible personal property, real property or intangible property) or a service? If the supplier is supplying or providing a service, then the HST place of supply rules for services should be used.


On April 30, 2010, the Department of Finance released Draft Regulations in relation to Place of Supply for Property and Services.


The next question is whether one of the specific place of supply rules applies or the general place of supply rules for services. Determine whether any of the following types of services are being provided and, if so, go to the specific place of supply rule:


• personal services (e.g., a hair cut)
• services in relation to real property (e.g., constructing a house);
• services in relation to intangible property (e.g., designing a trade mark)
• computer-related services and Internet access;
• telecommunication services;
• premium rate telephone services;
• services in relation to a location specific event (e.g., participation in a conference);
• passenger transportation services;
• services supplied on board conveyances;
• baggage charges;
• services of child supervision;
• services related to a ticket, voucher or reservation;
• freight transportation services;
• postage and delivery services;
• customs brokerage services;
• air navigation services;
• repairs, maintenance, cleaning, alterations and other services relating to goods;
• service of a trustee in respect of a trust governed by an RRSP, RRIF or RESP.


If the supplier is not providing any of the above listed specific services (and note the devil may be in the details), then the general place of supply rules for services will apply. There are 5 general place of supply rules for services, which must be applied in the following order. Rule 1, 2 and 5 are the fundamental rules. Rules 3 and Rule 4 are tie-breaker rules
 

Continue Reading...

British Columbia Releases Lists of What is Subject to HST and What is Not

The Government of British Columbia has published a 12 page document listing many items that are subject to harmonized sales tax (HST) after July 1, 2010 and what will not be subject to HST.  I hope this helps friends in B.C.

What Are The HST Place of Supply Rules For Customs Brokers?

On February 25, 2010, the Department of Finance released a News Release summarizing the proposed harmonized sales tax (“HST”) place of supply rules and shortly thereafter the Canada Revenue Agency released a GST/HST Technical Information Bulletin setting out its administrative position. On April 30, 2010, the Department of Finance released “Draft Regulations in respect of the Place of Supply of Property and Services” (the “Draft Regulations”). There is a separate HST place of supply rule for customs brokerage services.


Section 24 of the Draft Regulations sets out the HST place of supply rules for customs brokerage services:


24.(1) Where a supply of a service is made in respect of the importation of goods and the service is the arranging for their release (as defined in subsection 2(1) of the Customs Act) or the fulfilling, in respect of the importation, of any requirement under that Act or the Customs Tariff to account for the goods, to report, to provide information or to remit any amount,


(a) if the goods are accounted for as commercial goods (as defined in subsection 212.1(1) of the Act) under section 32 of the Customs Act, the supply is made in the province in which the goods are situated at the time of their release;
(b) if paragraph (a) does not apply and tax, calculated at the tax rate for a participating province, is imposed under subsection 212.1(2) of the Act, or would be so imposed if subsections 212.1(3) and (4) and section 213 of the Act did not apply, in respect of the importation, the supply is made in that participating province; and
(c) in any other case, the supply is made in a non-participating province.


(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the supply of any service provided in relation to an objection, appeal, redetermination, re-appraisal, review, refund, abatement, remission or drawback, or in relation to a request for any of the foregoing.


This means that:


Rule 1: If commercial goods are imported into Canada, the place of supply of the customs brokerage and related services is in the province in which the goods are released. Therefore, if the goods are released at Toronto Pearson International Airport, the Ontario HST (13%) would apply. If the goods are released at the Vancouver Port, then British Columbia HST (12%) will apply. If the goods are released at the Halifax Port, the Nova Scotia HST (15%) will apply after July 1, 2010.

 

Continue Reading...

Landlords Not Happy about HST and are Asking Tenants to Leave

One of the benefits of The HST Blog is that I receive information from followers and can share their real life stories about living with harmonized sales tax (HST) and the negative effects of HST.

I have received an email from a follower, B, about her mother being asked to leave a rented condominium unit by a landlord.  B has informed (and I have changed a few details to protect B [look for brackets]):

My mother has rented a condo for the last 3 1/2 years in [Ontario]. She does not have a lease but merely an agreement with the landlord to pay monthly [rent]. The landlord showed up for the rent check on Sat May 1, 2010. At that time he informed her that [the landlord's] family would be moving into the condo and he gave her a brief letter and he signed it. He gave her 2 months notice that she has to be out by (coincidentally) June 30, 2010.

I have heard that landlords can only increase rent by a certain percent (2.1% ?) but this is how some landlords can get around that. I started looking for some rentals in [Ontario] online as soon as my mother informed me about this [meeting with her landlord]. I did phone one person that was advertising a sublease for 3 months for $1100.00 per month. He informed me that after the sublease the rent was being increased to $1270.00 per month.

What this real life story tells us is that HST is affecting the decisions of landlords and negatively impacting tenants (already).  Rentals of residential real property are not subject to Ontario retail sales tax (ORST) or British Columbia social services tax (BCSST). Rentals of residential real property are exempt for goods and services tax (GST)/HST purposes. This means that landlords are not entitled to claim input tax credits and cannot recover GST/HST paid on purchases.  HST (and GST) would be payable on landlord's costs such as electricity, heating fuel, landscaping, snow removal, repairs, management fees (paid to third parties), security, supply and install fixtures (carpets, paint, cabinets, etc.), etc.

As a result, if a landlord's costs of operating the property increase due to HST, then the landlord will want to pass those increased costs on to the tenants.  However, the landlords may not be able to pass on the costs to existing tenants (under the landlord-tenant laws).  Some landlords are asking the existing tenants to leave so that they may charge new tenants a higher amount of rent.  Under the law, landlords are limited in the reasons for asking a tenant to leave.  One of the acceptable reasons for asking a tenant to leave is that the landlord is moving into the residential real property unit.

What we are learning is that HST may result in homelessness of individuals as landlords ask tenants to leave.  HST is negatively affecting some seniors on fixed incomes who have been asked to leave their rented homes.  It may not be easy for individuals to find new affordable housing.  In addition, moving ones possessions requires friends/family or a moving company (which costs money).

What we might see is landlords increasing rents and tenants having to accept the higher costs (if they can afford the higher rent) even if the rent increase is contrary to the law.

These negative effects cannot be solved by a one-time cheque.

British Columbia Government Restructures Itself To Save HST Costs

The Globe and Mail newspaper is reporting in an article entitled "B.C. alters health structure to avoid $3.5 million HST bill" published on May 7, 2010 that the British Columbia is undergoing a restructuring. The B.C. Ministry of Health Services and the CEOs of the provincial health authorities have agreed to tuck the Shared Services Organization, which provides services such as computer support and bulk purchasing for the health sector, under one of the health departments / crown entities.

The reason for the reorganization is that the Shared Services Organization would otherwise be required to charge HST on supplies made to the Government of British Columbia and other provincial health entities AND cannot recover all of the HST by way of input tax credits or public service bodies rebates.  Hopefully we will get more detailed about the reorganization to learn whether the changes create exempt supplies (instead of taxable supplies) or non-taxable labour.  This will help us identify other HST savings opportunities.

The question that taxpayers should be asking is whether the Ontario Government and the B.C Government have undertaken a complete analysis of their internal operations in order to address all situations where the provincial government must pay #HST (and GST) on supplies made in the province (or to businesses in HST provinces) that is not recoverable.  We should be asking if HST is going to cause provincial budgets to balloon.  We should be asking whether those who are implementing HST recognize the cost effects associated with HST.  Proof of understanding the cost effects is the government itself taking steps to minimize the negative effects within the government spending structure.

I would guess that the Ontario Government has not asked each and every government employee and manager and Deputy Minister to go over their budgets to identify unrecoverable HST costs within Ministry, department and Crown entity budgets.  Let's wait for the NDP and Conservative opposition parties to find what the governing HST Liberals have overlooked.  I will predict a few big budget line items increasing due to unrecoverable HST.  This will be a topic for discussion and accountability into the future (after HST implementation).  I wonder if the Ontario Ombudsman is going to be busy looking at HST issues.

The other side to this story is that if the BC and Ontario governments must reorganize due to HST,: what about businesses?  Both Ontario and British Columbia have said that HST will reduce administrative costs for business.  Well, here is an example within the BC Government that shows an INCREASE in administrative costs resulting from the implementation of HST.  The reality is that HST will increase administrative costs for certain businesses (especially where amounts are paid for services and other goods and services not subject to provincial sales tax).

The tax officials' counter-argument is that businesses (like the BC Government) can reorganize to avoid increased HST administrative costs.  That is correct.  Steps may, in certain cases, be made to minimize HST costs.  However, the restructuring of business organizations will cost businesses money - legal fees, accounting fees, advisors fees, etc.  So, businesses must spend money during the worst economic recession in recent years in order to save HST in the future.  In addition, any business that reorganizes will have to ask questions whether their restructuring may be challenged by the Canada Revenue Agency using the GST/HST general anti-avoidance rule.  It may not be so simple.

HST Place of Supply Rules for Litigators and Those Who Provide Litigation Services (Revised)

The harmonized sales tax (HST) place of supply rules include a specific rules for "services rendered in connection with litigation". These rules apply to lawyers, process servers, transcription service providers, those who provide expert opinions in connection with litigation, etc.

Section 26 of the Draft Regulations in respect of Place of Supply for Property and Services released on April 30, 2010 sets out the proposed specific place of supply rules for services in relation to litigation:

"A supply of a service rendered in connection with criminal, civil or administrative litigation (other than a service rendered before the commencement of such litigation) that is under the jurisdiction of a court or other tribunal established under the laws of a province, or in the nature of an appeal from a decision of a court or other tribunal established under the laws of a province, is made in that province."

More simply put, the rules are:


Rule #1: The general place of supply rules for services will apply to criminal, civil or administrative litigation services provided prior to the commencement of such litigation.
For example, if a person hires a lawyer to discuss whether the facts warrant litigation, the general rules apply. If a person hires a lawyer to sue an opponent and discussions lead to a settlement before a statement of claim is filed with the Court, the general place of supply rules would apply.
 

Rule #2: The general place of supply rules will apply to services in connection with litigation that is under the jurisdiction of a Court or other Tribunal established under the laws of Canada (rather than the laws of a province).


Rule #3: The general rules for services will not apply to litigation services rendered after the commencement of litigation. If the services are in connection with litigation that is under the jurisdiction of a court in an HST province (Ontario, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick or Newfoundland/Labrador) or is in the nature of an appeal from a decision of a court or other Tribunal established under the laws of an HST province, then HST applies.


If litigation has commenced (e.g., there is an initiating document such as a statement of claim) and Rule 3 applies, a supply of a service rendered in connection with criminal, civil or administrative litigation in an HST province, the supply will be regarded as being made in that HST province. In other words, if the litigation is in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and you have a court file number assigned, HST at the rate of 13% applies.


Rule #4: If litigation has commenced (e.g., there is an initiating document such as a statement of claim), a supply of a service rendered in connection with criminal, civil or administrative litigation filed with a court under the laws of a non-HST province (e.g., Alberta), the supply will be regarded as being made in that non-HST province. In other words, if the litigation is in Alberta and you have a court file number assigned, HST will not be applicable to the services in connection with the litigation (however GST will be applicable).


Rule #5: If a supply of services in respect of litigation is supplied to a non-resident of Canada, the zero-rating provisions may apply to both the GST and HST component. The HST place of supply rules do not override the zero-rating provisions for exported services and professional services.
 

An unanswered question is whether an arbitration is "litigation" under the place of supply rules and, therefore, subject to the specific place of supply rule discussed above. If the Canada Revenue Agency takes the position that an arbitration is caught by the rules, arbitration centres in the HST Zone may not be popular with Canadian parties. Also, business law lawyers and in-house counsel may have to reconsider contractually stipulating that Ontario or British Columbia as the place of arbitration in contracts.


Lawyers should consider whether their clients can save HST based on the place of filing and should start asking the questions as part of their litigation strategy now --- given that litigation filed today will likely continue after HST implementation.


Lawyers and service providers should also recognize that the place of supply rule for pre-filing services is different than post-filing litigation services. Therefore, one file might involve a change in the HST rate. When this happens, it is best to open a new file at the time of the filing of the initiating document
 

Canada's Department of Finance Has Released Draft HST Place of Supply Rules Regulations

On April 30, 2010, Canada's Department of Finance released "Draft Regulations in respect of the Place of Supply of Property and Services".  Section 33 states that the Place of Supply (GST/HST) Regulations are to be repealed and replaced by the Regulations in respect of the Place of Supply of Property and Services.  Even though these regulations have been released in draft form, the will apply to supplies made (a) on or after May 1, 2010 and (b) after February 25, 2010 and before May 1, 2010 unless any part of the consideration for the supply becomes due or is paid before May 1, 2010.

It is very important to note that the place of supply rules have changed slightly in certain cases.  For example. the place of supply rules for services in connection with litigation have changed from:

February 25, 2010 version: "A supply of a service rendered in connection with criminal. civil or administrative litigation in a particular province will be regarded as being made in that province.

to:

April 30, 2010 version: A supply of a service rendered in connection with criminal, civil or administrative litigation (other than a service rendered before the commencement of such litigation) that is under the jurisdiction of a court or other tribunal established under the laws of a province or in the nature of an appeal from a decision of a court of other tribunal established under the laws of a province, is made in that province.

The HST Blog raised concerns about the draft place of supply rule for litigation services and may have influenced the change.

There are other changes to the draft regulations that will be discussed in future blog posts. Please note that draft regulations trump administrative announcements.

Reminder: May 1, 2010 May Be Your Official Start of HST Collection/Paying Obligations

This may be your last week of harmonized sales tax (HST) freedom. Sorry to be the messenger of the news.

July 1 may be the "official" implementation date of HST in Ontario/British Columbia; however, under the transition rules, all current GST registrants (wherever they are located) currently doing business in Ontario/BC, may be required to collect the 13% HST starting on  May 1, 2010.

Rule 1: If a customer purchases goods after May 1, 2010 AND pays for the goods after May 1, 2010 AND the goods are delivered after July 1, 2010, HST will be collectible on that sale even if the money is paid before July 1, 2010.  For example, a consumer purchases a custom sofa on May 2, 2010.  The delivery date for the sofa is July 23, 2010.  HST will be collectible and payable on the amounts paid for the sofa after May 1, 2010 due to the delivery date of the goods.

Rule 2:  A client purchases services after May 1, 2010 AND pays for the services after May 1, 2010 AND the services are provided after July 1, 2010, HST will be collectible on that sale even if the money is paid before July 1, 2010.  For example, a client contracts with a painter who is really busy due to the incoming HST.  He cannot paint the rooms in the house until August 2010.  Even if the client pays the painter before July 1, 2010, the supply is subject to HST because the services will be performed after July 1, 2010.

Exception to Rule 2: HST will not be payable by other clients of the painter who starts to provide the services before July 1, 2010 and is 90% complete as of July 1, 2010.

Rule #3: If a lessor (supplier) leases equipment to a lessee (recipient) starting on May 1, 2010 for 12 months and is paid in full on May 30, 2010 for the 12 month lease period, GST and HST will be collectible and payable on 10 of the monthly lease installments. GST and Ontario retail sales tax (or British Columbia Social Service tax) would be collectible and payable for 2 (May and June) of the 12 months.  Assumption is that place of supply rules puts the equipment in Ontario or BC.

If a supplier collects HST in May or June 2010, they do not remit it until their first GST/HST return after July 1, 2010.  In other words, this is the one time that it is okay to keep the tax collected for a little longer than your next return.  The reason why the Ontario and British Columbia do not want supplies to remit the HST in May or June is that the provinces will not get the money.  The HST will be characterized and GST in the computer systems.  That being said, all GST, ORST and BCSST must be remitted on time.

Key HST Dates to Help With Preparation

There are a number of key dates in the time lines for harmonized sales tax (HST) in Ontario and British Columbia.  I hope that these time lines help you prepare and organize yourselves.

Ontario

 

March 23, 2009

 

McGuinty Government announces plans to implement HST

After October 14, 2009 Certain businesses and public service bodies may be required to self-assess and remit the provincial component of HST (=8%)
March 25, 2010 Place of Supply Rules announced
May 1, 2010

GST registrants will begin to charge and collect HST for property and/or services to be delivered after July 1, 2010 (if not paid in full by April 30, 2010)

Ontario businesses should be registered for GST/HST purposes

Systems should be in place to record and track HST (collected and paid) and restricted input tax credits

Week of June 28, 2010 To the extent possible, issue pre-HST invoices and reduce audit risk
July 1, 2010

HST Implementation Date (13% HST applies)

Certain Ontario businesses will be required to file GST/HST returns electronically

Businesses that are required to file GST/HST returns electronically should take steps to be ready

July 23, 2010 Final Ontario retail sales tax return is due
August 31, 2010 Any monthly GST/HST filer must remit HST collected between May 1, 2010 and July 31, 2010
October 31, 2010

Any applicable Ontario retail sales tax must be paid by this date

Any quarterly GST/HST filer must remit HST collected between May 1, 2010 and September 3, 2010

November 23, 2010 Final Ontario retail sales tax supplemental return is due

 

British Columbia

 

July 23, 2009

 

Campbell Government announces plans to implement HST

After October 14, 2009 Certain businesses and public service bodies may be required to self-assess and remit the provincial component of HST (=7%)
March 25, 2010 Place of Supply Rules announced
May 1, 2010

GST registrants will begin to charge and collect HST for property and/or services to be delivered after July 1, 2010 (if not paid in full by April 30, 2010)

BC businesses should be registered for GST/HST purposes

Systems should be in place to record and track HST (collected and paid) and restricted input tax credits

Week of June 28, 2010 To the extent possible, issue pre-HST invoices and reduce audit risk
July 1, 2010

HST Implementation Date (12% HST applies)

Certain British Columbia businesses will be required to file GST/HST returns electronically

Businesses that are required to file GST/HST returns electronically should take steps to be ready

July 23, 2010 Final British Columbia social service tax return is due
August 31, 2010 Any monthly GST/HST filer must remit HST collected between May 1, 2010 and July 31, 2010
October 31, 2010

Any applicable British Columbia social service tax must be paid by this date

Any quarterly GST/HST filer must remit HST collected between May 1, 2010 and September 3, 2010

January 23, 2011

Final British Columbia social service tax supplemental return is due

Vendors will be entitled to commissions re final British Columbia social services tax returns and supplemental returns filed before this date

 

This Is The Time To Revisit Your 2010 Budget - HST Changes May Present Opportunities

Whenever the government announces tax reform or a tax auditor plans to conduct an audit, these events that businesses cannot control present an opportunity to revisit past planning.  For example, harmonized sales tax implementation in Ontario and British Columbia on July 1, 2010 and the change in the HST rate in Nova Scotia on July 1, 2010 should encourage proactive businesses to go over their 2010 budget plans.  Some budget items will be affected by the outside changes and, therefore, should be adjusted upwards or downwards so that the business stays within budget.

For example, hospitals, doctors offices, dentists offices, nursing homes/long term care homes, residential rental property businesses, charities, day cares, schools, colleges, universities and other educational institutions, an other businesses engaged in whole or on part in exempt activities will see their costs increase and will not be able to recover 100% of the increased costs.  These are the businesses that will benefit most from the exercise of taking their 2010 Budget, adjusting for new HST costs, recalculating, and then making changes.

In addition, large businesses and large corporate groups (where the business or corporate group makes taxable and zero-rated sales in excess of $10 million per 12 month period) will be subject to the restricted input tax credit rules and, therefore will see certain costs increase by 8% without the corresponding recovery.  Where costs go up, and offsetting change may be required.

These businesses have an opportunity (I know, it does not seem like a positive event)  to review budget plans and make adjustments.  It may be that certain expenses will have to be cut.  it may be that profit margins will have to increase.  It may be that the review of commercial rent (which will be subject to HST after July 1, 2010) will cause a reconsideration of the location of the business and a better location may be identified.  It may be that cost savings opportunities may be identified (e.g.,  subscriptions are a less expensive option if paid before July 1, 2010).   It may be that new technology may be installed to control/reduce energy costs in the long term.  It may be that ORST recovery or GST/HST recovery opportunities will be identified (that the business had been overlooking).  It may be that the investigation will result in a new road map for the business to more profits.

In an unrelated matter last week (which I will use as an example), I assisted a client with a NAFTA verification.  The review of the business operations in preparation of a visit from the United States Customs and Border Protection, the client undertook the analysis of the bill of materials and the costs to produce a product.  That analysis resulted in the client identifying changes in costs due to the appreciation of the Canadian dollar and the squeezing of the profit margin.  As a result of the unwelcome verification, changes were made on the purchase side and sales side of the business.  The result will be a healthier balance sheet at the end of 2010.

Change is not fun.  Change is rarely welcome.  Usually change means more work.  The question is whether the results of the new work will be positive for the business.

For The Next Two Weeks Only, No HST On Goods and Services Delivered After July 1

Some businesses in Ontario and British Columbia have a promotional opportunity.  Businesses that sell goods and/or services may advertise that if payment in full is received before May 1, 2010 for goods and/or services to be delivered after July 1, 2010, HST will not be payable.  Few customers/clients may be aware of this opportunity to take advantage of the Ontario transition rules and British Columbia transition rules.  Please refer to the HST Library for more government publications on the transition rules.

April 16 - 30, 2010 presents an opportunity to place an ad on your web-site, post a promotional sign in your store window, change your voice mail greeting, or place more traditional advertising.  For example, a hair stylist or massage therapist may offer coupons for services to be delivered after July 1, 2010.  If the client pays in full for the book of coupons before May 1, 2010, then the service provider will not be required to charge, collect and remit HST (even when the pre-paid coupon is used).  Another example is that a buyer of custom furniture may pay for the furniture in full before May 1, 2010 and will not have to pay HST if the custom furniture is delivered after July 1, 2010.

There is a risk for the buyer of non-delivery of goods and/or non-performance of services.  Buyers will have to weigh the credibility of the supplier against their desire to save the HST.  However, if my hair stylist were to present this opportunity to me and I have been going to Jie Matar for years, I would feel comfortable parting with my money.  Each consumer will have to assess their comfort with pre-payment.

NOTE: Prepayment is different than a deposit.  A deposit that can be returned (such as a lawyer's retainer) may not satisfy the payment prior to May 1, 2010 transition rule requirement.  If the deposit is held in trust and is not applied to an invoice for delivery or performance before July 1, 2010, the CRA auditors may expect HST.  The CRA has administrative positions relating to deposits that are based on provisions in the Excise Tax Act.  In other words, use of the word "deposit" may be problematic in an audit.  The payment must be a pre-payment or consideration for the goods and/or services.

If a business takes advantage of the transition rules, they must keep detailed records.  An auditor may show up to conduct an audit in 3 years and will ask why HST was not collected on the deliveries (services performed) that occurred after July 1, 2010.  The business will have to provide evidence of the payment before May 1, 2010 (an auditor will not rely on a statement).  It will be important to enter the receipts of money into the business records (e.g., general ledger accounts for April 2010) as soon as possible and preferably in April 2010.  Frequent trips to the bank in April 2010 is highly recommended so that you can prove the deposits - you must have received the money from the customer or client if you deposited the money in the bank.  The purchase of a "PAID" stamp from the office supplies store would be helpful (but may not be considered definitive proof because the stamp could be used in May, June, July) -- a stamp on each paid invoice along with the date of payment would be evidence if matched with other documents (such as photocopied cheques, bank statements, credit card receipts, etc.).  Scanning documents into computerized records that will show an April 2010 saved date may be useful.

I would like to note that auditors can be difficult and not accept documentary evidence.  lawyers and courts like documentary evidence. A real attempt to keep accurate records may satisfy due diligence defense requirements even if the record-keeping is not perfect.

B.C. NDP Party Hopes to Prevent Passage of HST Legislation

The British Columbia Times Colonist newspaper is reporting that the New Democratic Party (NDP) in British Columbia is planning to use any means available to prevent the passage of Bill 9 - 2010 "The Consumption Tax Rebate and Transition Act" that was tabled in the British Columbia Legislature on March 30, 2010. That being said, the fist vote relating to the Bill passed 47 to 34 due to the number of seats held by Premier Campbell's Liberal Government. So, while the NDP's plans to stop the unpopular HST legislation should be welcomed by the electorate, they should not expect to be saved from HST.

The report indicates that the NDP leader, Carole James, plans to use legislature procedures to have a debate. The NDP plan to table amendments to Bill 9-2010 and take their allotted speaking time in the Legislature. The hope is at least a one month delay,

The Ontario Progressive Conservative Party, lead by Tim Hudak, tried unsuccessfully to delay the passage of the Ontario version of the HST legislation using similar legislative mechanisms.  However, Bill - 218  Ontario Plan for More Jobs and growth Act, 2009" passed in Ontario in December 9, 2009.

The unfortunate reality is that HST is going to be a reality soon - very soon.  The late passage of legislation in British Columbia will not help businesses prepare.  In fact, if the delay tactics successfully take a month or more, HST collection obligations may have already kicked in -- as of May 1, 2010.  Businesses must collect HST on supplies of property and/or services if:

(1) the contract is entered into after April 30, 2010

(2) the property and/or services are to be delivered after July 1, 2010, and

(3) consideration is paid after May 1, 2010

It is also unfortunate that the place of supply rules have been released in administrative statement format only (as of April 1, 2010).  The regulations have not been promulgated by the Federal Government.  As a result, as of April 1, 2010, businesses do not have sufficient information to ensure they are ready as of May 1, 2010 or even July 1, 2010.  Something that should be discussed is a period of leniency by the Canada Revenue Agency regarding enforcement.

British Columbia Starts Process to Pass HST Legislation

On March 30, 2010, the Government of British Columbia tabled Bill 9-2010, which is legislation to implement harmonized sales tax (HST) into B.C. law and wind down the British Columbia social services tax (BCSST) and hotel room tax. The HST implementing legislation is called the Consumption Tax Rebate and Transition Act. The Government of British Columbia also issue a press release at the time the Bill was tabled in the Legislature.

The HST rate for the province of British Columbia will be 12%. HST will come into effect on July 1, 2010.

The Consumption Tax Rebate and Transition Act eliminates the seven-per cent BCSST and introduces HST-related measures designed to mitigate the impacts of the HST on persons in British Columbia.

It is expected that the legislation will be passed in due course. This is a necessary step in the process.

Will HST Apply to Imports of Goods Into Ontario and British Columbia?

There is some misinformation about whether HST will apply to imports into the new HST provinces (Ontario and British Columbia) after July 1, 2010. I hope I can clear up some of the confusion.

The first place to look for the answer to the question of whether HST apply to imports into Ontario, you need to look at the Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreement Between The Government of Canada and The Government of Ontario ("CITCA-O").  Part VIII of the CITCA-O addresses imports and provides as follows:

23. In this Part, unless otherwise defined for the purposes of Part IX of the Excise Tax Act, the term “non-commercial imported goods" means imported goods, other than goods imported into Canada for sale or for any commercial, industrial, occupational, institutional or other like use.

24. Unless otherwise provided in this Part, the importation into Canada of non-commercial imported goods by, or for, a consumer that is a resident (including a “seasonal resident" as defined for the purposes of the Seasonal Residents’ Remission Order, 1991) of the Province will be subject to the PVAT in respect of the Province in accordance with the rules generally applicable to the importation of goods into Canada under Part IX of the Excise Tax Act, and any other special rules under that Part developed for purposes of the PVAT in respect of the Province.

25. Canada will neither assess nor collect under this agreement any product-specific tax, levy or mark-up imposed by the Province in respect of the importation of goods subject to a specific tax collection agreement between Canada and the Province.

26. The PVAT in respect of the Province will not be applicable to the importation into Canada of any goods other than non-commercial imported goods in accordance with the rules under Part IX of the Excise Tax Act, and any other special rules under that Part developed for purposes of the PVAT in respect of the Province.

27. Goods, other than non-commercial imported goods, which are imported into Canada for consumption or use, or for supply in whole or in part, otherwise than in the course of commercial activities, in the Province by a person, will be subject to self-assessment of the PVAT in respect of the Province by the person in accordance with the rules under Part IX of the Excise Tax Act, and any other special rules under that Part developed for purposes of the PVAT in respect of the Province. PVAT in respect of the Province will also apply through the self-assessment provisions under Division IV of that Part.

28. The Province will assess and collect, at the time of vehicle registration in the Province, any PVAT in respect of the Province payable in respect of motor vehicles imported into Canada as non-commercial imported goods.

The BC CITCA has similar provisions.

What this all means is:

Rule 1. HST (called PVAT in the CITCA-O) is payable in respect of non-commercial imports of goods and will be collected by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) at the border. For example, if an individual purchases a kindle from amazon.com for personal use, HST will be applicable. Generally speaking, if the importer does not have an import number (the RM extension on a business number), the CBSA will consider the importer to be bringing in non-commercial imports. Also, if the importer appears to be an individual and the "ship to" address is residential, the CBSA will consider the importer to be bringing in non-commercial imports. Please note that goods and services tax ("GST") will also be applicable.

Rule 2. There are exceptions to Rule 1. If an imported good is a non-taxable supply, an exempt supply or a zero-rated supply, HST will not be applicable. The import documentation (the B3 Customs Coding Form) will have to indicate the proper code in order to be relieved of HST.

Rule 3. Commercial importations of goods will not be subject to HST. That is, if a business imports goods, the CBSA will not impose HST at the border. The CBSA will still collect the GST.

Rule 4. In addition to Rule 3, Commercial importations of goods by businesses for consumption or use, or for supply in whole or in part, otherwise than in the course of commercial activities, in the Province by a person will be subject to HST and the importer will be required to self-assess any applicable HST on its GST/HST return. Depending on the place of supply rules, the HST rate applicable to the relevant province will apply.

Rule 5. Businesses that are residents in an HST province that are not engaged in commercial activities or import services and/or intangible property for consumption or use  or supply in whole or in part otherwise than in commercial activities (meaning in exempt activities) will be required to self-assess applicable HST on imported taxable supplies of services and/or intangible property.

If you require additional guidance, please refer to the old GST/HST Technical Information Bulletin for the Maritime HST provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick & Newfoundland/Labrador) TIB-081 "Application of HST to Imports" Note: when reading TIB-081, please remember that the place of supply rules are changing and TIB-081 will have to be updated.

Please be mindful of the CBSA's D-Memo D13-3-13 "Post-Importation Payments or Fees: Subsequent Proceeds" which takes the position that certain management and administrative fees and amounts paid by the importer to the exporter (or subsidiary to parent) after importation must be added to the price paid or payable. This could result in additional GST and HST being payable in respect of imported taxable supplies or property and/services. You will also have to be careful to ensure that some services that are added to the price payable for goods (and reported on a B2 Adjustment) are not duplicated in a self-assessment of GST/HST on a GST/HST return.

HST Place of Supply Rules for Customs Brokers

On February 25, 2010, the Department of Finance released a News Release about what will be the HST place of supply rules after regulations are promulgated. Interestingly, the Department of Finance is going to create a separate rule for customs brokerage services. "Customs brokerage services" are currently understood to mean:

"a service of arranging for the release of imported goods, or fulfilling, in respect of the importation, (whether before, at the time of or after the release) any accounting,, reporting or information requirements imposed under the Customs Act or the Customs Tariff Act or any requirements under either of those Acts to remit any amount."

Since I wrote on March 17, 2010 about the HST rules for imports, I thought I should share the funny little place of supply rules for customs brokers services.

In the February 25, 2010 News Release, the Department of Finance wrote:

Under the current rules, the place of supply of a service of arranging for the release of imported goods, or fulfilling, in respect of the importation, (whether before, at the time of or after the release) any accounting,, reporting or information requirements imposed under the Customs Act or the Customs Tariff Act or any requirements under either of those Acts to remit any amount is in a province if the goods are situated in that province at the time of their release.

It is proposed that this rule continue to apply in respect of commercial goods. However, in the case of non-commercial goods, generally if the provincial component of HST for a participating province is imposed in respect of the importation of the goods, the supply of the customs brokerage service will be regarded as made in that participating province.

The above rules will not apply to the supply of any service provided in relation to an objection, appeal, re-determination, re-appraisal, review, refund, abatement, remission or drawback, or in relation to a request for any of the foregoing. These types of services will continue to be subject to the place of supply rules for services described in other parts of this document.

The changes to the Excise Tax Act or the Regulations still have to be made public and must undergo the applicable legislative steps to become law.

The CRA clarifies the place of supply rules in GST/HST Technical Information Bulletin B-103 "Harmonized Sales Tax: Place of suppy rules for determining whether a supply is made in a province" as follows:

Rule #1: If the importation is commercial goods (for which HST is not collected), the place of supply of the customs brokerage and related services is in the province in which the goods are released. Therefore, if the goods are released at Toronto Pearson Airport, the Ontario HST would apply. If the goods are released at the Vancouver Port, then British Columbia HST will apply.

However, if goods are placed in a bonded warehouse in Montreal, HST would not be applicable to the brokerage charges.

Rule #2: If the customs brokerage services relate to an objection, appeal, re-determination, re-appraisal, review, refund, abatement, remission or drawback, or in relation to a request for any of the foregoing (called herein "post-importation customs brokerage services"), Rule #1 does not apply. The general place of supply rules for services would be applicable.

The 5 main place of supply rules for services are applied in the following order:

(a) If the recipient's address or the address most closely connected with the supply in in the HST Zone, the applicable HST rate would be applied to the post-importation customs brokerage services;

(b) If the recipient does not have a Canadian address, the post-importation customs brokerage services will be considered to be supplied in the province in which the greatest proportion of the services is performed. For example, if the customs broker is located in Ontario and a customs broker in Ontario completes the B2 adjustments/appeals, then Ontario HST would apply.

(c) If 2 applies and the post-importation customs brokerage services are performed equally in two or more particular HST provinces, the HST province with the highest HST rate would be considered to be the place of supply.

(d) If 3 applies but a single HST province cannot be identified (same 13% rate in more than one province), the post-importation customs brokerage services will be subject to 13% HST.

(e) If the recipient does not have a Canadian address and the customs brokerage service is not performed primarily in an HST province or the HST Zone, then HST would not apply to the post-importation customs brokerage services.

Rule #3: If the importation relates to non-commercial goods, whether HST applies to the customs brokerage service will depend on whether the goods are subject to HST under the place of supply rules for goods. 

Proposed HST Place of Supply Rule For Real Property Is Relatively Straight-Forward

On February 25, 2010, Canada's Department of Finance released its proposed harmonized sales tax (HST) place of supply rules which will be used to determine whether a supplier (Seller) must charge, collect and remit HST in connection with a supply made in Canada and whether a recipient (Buyer) must pay HST in connection with an acquisition or importation and at what rate. Simply put, the proposed HST place of supply rules will be used to determine in which province a supply is considered to have occurred for HST purposes.

The proposed place of supply rule for real property is relatively straight-forward. With respect to the place of supply rule for real property, the Department of Finance did not make any changes to the current rule applicable in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, & Newfoundland and Labrador.

A supply of real property will be considered to be made in the province in which the real property is situated. If the real property being supplied is located in British Columbia, HST will be applicable at the rate of 12%. If the real property being supplied is located in Ontario, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick or Newfoundland and Labrador, HST will be applicable at the rate of 13%. If the real property being supplied is located in Quebec, Prince Edward Island, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta or one of the three territories, HST will not be applicable. However, GST would be applicable at the rate of 5%.

The Department of Finance provides the following example:

    A sale of a warehouse situated in Sarnia, Ontario will be subject to HST at a rate of 13 per cent (a 5 per cent federal component and an 8 per cent Ontario component).

Some other examples would be:

  • A sale of timber lands situated in British Columbia will be subject to HST at a rate of 12 per cent (a 5 per cent federal component and an 7 per cent British Columbia component).
  • A sale of vacant land situated in Goderich, Ontario will be subject to HST at a rate of 13 per cent (a 5 per cent federal component and an 8 per cent Ontario component).
  • A sale of a resource property (the land component) in Alberta, will not be subject to HST, but will be subject to GST.

In addition, the supply of an interest in real property is considered to be a supply of real property and the HST place of supply rules for real property would apply. For example, an option to purchase real property would be considered to be real property. If a recipient pays an amount for the right to purchase a leased factory in 10 years, the payment would subject to HST if the factory is located in the HST Zone (British Columbia, Ontario, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick or Newfoundland and Labrador.

The lease of real property is also considered to be a supply of real property. For example, a lease of office space in Toronto, Ontario will be subject to HST at a rate of 13 per cent (a 5 per cent federal component and an 8 per cent Ontario component).

If a company in Ontario leases a commercial office building in British Columbia, the supply of real property will be considered to be made in British Columbia. As a result, HST would be imposed at a rate of 12 per cent (a 5 per cent federal component and an 7 per cent British Columbia component) despite the fact the company is incorporated under the laws of Ontario. The key fact is that the real property that is being leased is located in British Columbia.

There will be situations where a person owns real property in more than one Canadian province and transfers all or some of its assets to another person. For example, a large Canadian company with real property assets in Ontario and Quebec sells all of the assets of its business. In this case, it is proposed that the place of supply rules will deem there to have been separate supplies of real property in Ontario and Quebec. The transfer of the real property located in Ontario would be subject to HST at a rate of 13 per cent (a 5 per cent federal component and an 8 per cent Ontario component). The transfer of the real property located in Quebec would be subject to GST at a rate of 5 per cent and would not be subject to HST (would be subject to QST).

Conversely, a payment made to break a real property lease would be considered to be a supply of real property and would be subject to HST if the real property is located in the HST Zone.

HST Place of Supply Rules for Services

Warning: On April 30, 2010 the Department of Finance released draft place of supply rules regulations that supersede/override the information in this post.  Please do not rely on the information in this post.

Harmonized Sales Tax (“HST") will become a reality in Ontario and British Columbia on July 1, 2010. And some businesses are required to start collecting HST as of May 1, 2010.

Businesses in the HST Zone  - Ontario, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland/Labrador - will have to use the newly released place of supply rules, some of which are different from the existing place of supply rules (for Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland/Labrador). The applicable HST rates are:

  • Ontario: 13% (5% GST and 8% provincial HST component)
  • British Columbia: 12% (5% GST and 7% provincial HST component)
  • Nova Scotia: 13% (5% GST and 8% provincial HST component)
  • New Brunswick: 13% (5% GST and 8% provincial HST component)
  • Newfoundland/Labrador: 13% (5% GST and 8% provincial HST component)

In addition, some businesses outside the HST Zone will be required to charge, collect, and remit HST to the Federal Government in accordance with the place of supply rules when the place of supply is within the HST Zone.

On February 25, 2010, Canada's Department of Finance released its proposed harmonized sales tax (HST) place of supply rules which will be used to determine whether a supplier must charge, collect and remit HST in connection with a supply made in Canada and whether a recipient must pay HST in connection with an acquisition or importation and at what rate. Simply put, the proposed HST place of supply rules will be used to determine in which province a supply is considered to have occurred for HST purposes.

The HST place of supply rules for services have evolved from the existing rules to reflect the addition of the larger economic provinces of Ontario and British Columbia to the HST Zone.

The first question to ask when applying the HST place of supply rules is: What is being supplied or sold? Is it property (tangible personal property, real property or intangible property) or a service? If the supplier is supplying or providing a service, then the HST place of supply rules for services should be used.

The next question is whether one of the specific place of supply rules applies or the general place of supply rules for services. Determine whether any of the following types of services are being provided and, if so, go to the specific place of supply rule:

  • personal services (e.g., a hair cut)
  • services in relation to real property (e.g., constructing a house);
  • services in relation to intangible property (e.g., designing a trade mark)
  • computer-related services and Internet access;
  • telecommunication services;
  • premium rate telephone services;
  • services in relation to a location specific event (e.g., participation in a conference);
  • passenger transportation services;
  • services supplied on board conveyances;
  • baggage charges;
  • services of child supervision;
  • services related to a ticket, voucher or reservation;
  • freight transportation services;
  • postage and delivery services;
  • customs brokerage services;
  • air navigation services;
  • repairs, maintenance, cleaning, alterations and other services relating to goods;
  • service of a trustee in respect of a trust governed by an RRSP, RRIF or RESP.

If the supplier is not providing any of the above listed specific services (and note the devil may be in the details or the unpublished legislation or regulations), then the general place of supply rules for services will apply. There are 4 general place of supply rules for services, which must be applied in the following order. Rule #1 and Rule # 2 are the fundamental rules. Rules #3 and Rule #4 are tie-breaker rules.

Rule #1: If a supply of a service is made and, in the normal course of business, the supplier obtains a particular address of the recipient that is

(a) a home or business address in Canada of the recipient,

(b) where the supplier obtains more than one home or business address in Canada of the recipient, the home or business address that is most closely connected with the supply, or

(c) where the supplier does not obtain a home or business address in Canada of the recipient, another Canadian address that is most closely connected with the supply,

the supply will be regarded as made in the province in which the particular address is situated.

NOTE: The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has indicated that it will release additional guidance on how they plan to interpret the "most closely connected with the supply" requirement. The CRA plans on establishing a hierarchy of criteria to apply. The hierarchical criteria will be released in due course. However, we have been informed that the first criteria to apply are not the place of the billing address.

Rule # 2: If, in the normal course of business, an address in Canada of the recipient is not obtained by the supplier of a service, the supply will be regarded as having been made in a participating province if the part of the service that is performed in Canada is performed primarily in the participating provinces. In such instances, the supply will be regarded as made in the participating province in which the greatest proportion of the service is performed.

Rule #3: If (a) Rule #2 applies (i.e., no address in Canada of the recipient is obtained and the service that is performed in Canada is performed primarily in the participating provinces), and (b) a single participating province cannot be determined as being the participating province in which the greatest proportion of the service is performed because the service is performed equally in two or more particular participating provinces, then the supply will be regarded as made in the particular participating province for which the rate of the provincial component of HST is highest.

Rule #4: If Rule 3 applies, but a single participating province still cannot be determined to be the place of supply because the particular rate of the provincial component of the HST in two or more of the particular participating provinces is the same, the supplier will be required to charge HST by applying that particular rate. In other words, if 3 applies, but a single HST province cannot be identified (same 13% rate in more than one province), the services will be subject to 13% HST.

The application of the HST place of supply rules in any given situation may be a complicated legal task.

HST Place of Supply Rules for Litigators and Those Who Provide Litigation Services

Warning: On April 30, 2010 the Department of Finance released draft place of supply rules regulations that supersede/override the information in this post.  Please do not rely on the information in this post.

The HST place of supply rules include a specific rules for "services rendered in connection with litigation". These rules apply to lawyers, process servers, transcription service providers, those who provide expert opinions in connection with litigation, etc.

Rule #1: The general place of supply rules for services will apply to criminal, civil or administrative litigation services provided prior to the commencement of such litigation.  The general place of supply rule focuses on the billing address of the client and the place where the services are performed..  There is a hierarchy of 4 place of supply rules that are applied in order.

For example, if a person hires a lawyer to discuss whether the facts warrant litigation, the general rules apply.  If a person hires a lawyer to sue an opponent and discussions lead to a settlement before a statement of claim is filed with the Court, the general place of supply rules would apply. 

Rule #2: The general rules for services will not apply to litigation services rendered after the commencement of litigation. In other words, if there is an initiating document (such as a statement of claim) Rule 2 applies and Rule 1 does not apply.

Rule #3: If litigation has commenced, a supply of a service rendered in connection with criminal, civil or administrative litigation in an HST province will be regarded as being made in that HST province.  In other words, if the litigation is in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and you have a court file number assigned, HST at the rate of 13% applies.

Rule #4: If litigation has commenced, a supply of a service rendered in connection with criminal, civil or administrative litigation in a non-HST province (e.g., Alberta) will be regarded as being made in that non-HST province.  In other words, if the litigation is in Alberta and you have a court file number assigned, HST will not be applicable to the services in connection with the litigation (however GST will be applicable).

Rule #5: If a supply of services in respect of litigation is supplied to a non-resident of Canada, the zero-rating provisions may apply to both the GST and HST component. The HST place of supply rules do not override the zero-rating provisions for exported services and professional services.

The HST place of supply rules do not currently distinguish between federal court litigation and provincial court litigation. As a result, it is not clear whether filing a Tax Court of Canada case in Alberta will save the litigants HST.  It is also not clear whether all pre-hearing meetings and the trial must take place in Alberta if the case is filed in Alberta.

It is also not clear whether all cases filed with the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, which is located in Ottawa, will be subject to Ontario HST at 13% even if the affected litigant is located in Alberta. The same confusion will hold true for many other administrative tribunals with all the powers of a superior court of record, such as the CRTC, the Competition Bureau, to name a few. There are a number of federal statutes that create administrative tribunals and a number of federal statutes establish appeal rights only to that federal tribunal that happens to be located in the nation's capital, Ottawa, which is located in the HST Zone. it will be interesting to watch whether access to justice issues are raised by persons (such as individuals) who cannot recover HST costs.

Another question is whether an arbitration is "litigation" under the place of supply rules and, therefore, subject to the specific place of supply rule discussed above that bases the application of HST on the place of the filing. If the Canada Revenue Agency takes the position that an arbitration is caught by the rules, arbitration centres in the HST Zone may not be popular with Canadian parties. Also, business law lawyers and in-house counsel may have to reconsider contractually stipulating that Ontario or British Columbia as the place of arbitration in contracts.

Lawyers should consider whether their clients can save HST based on the place of filing and should start asking the questions as part of their litigation strategy now --- given that litigation filed today will likely continue after HST implementation.

Lawyers and service providers should also recognize that the place of supply rule for pre-filing services is different than post-filing litigation services. Therefore, one file might involve a change in the HST rate. When this happens, it is best to open a new file at the time of the filing of the initiating document.

HST Place of Supply Rules for Goods: Suppliers Outside HST Zone Also Affected

On February 25, 2010, Canada's Department of Finance released its proposed harmonized sales tax (HST) place of supply rules which will be used to determine whether a supplier must charge, collect and remit HST in connection with a supply made in Canada and whether a recipient must pay HST in connection with an acquisition or importation and at what rate. Simply put, the proposed HST place of supply rules will be used to determine in which province a supply is considered to have occurred for HST purposes.

The proposed HST place of supply rules for tangible personal property (goods) may surprise sellers of goods located in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec and Prince Edward Island. Based on the Canada Revenue Agency's (CRA) views, some suppliers located in non-HST provinces may be required to charge, collect and remit HST. All suppliers of goods in Canada may need to consider whether they want to continue to ship goods to recipients in the HST Zone (and in particular Ontario and British Columbia). Some sellers of goods need to start working quickly to update their computer systems and accounting systems to account for HST on supplies of goods.

The proposed HST Place of Supply Rules to be in effect after July 1, 2010 are:

Rule #1: A supply of goods by way of sale is deemed to be made in a province if the supplier (Seller) of the goods delivers the goods or makes the goods available to the recipient (Buyer) in the province. For example, if an individual goes into a store in Ontario and purchases goods (e.g., a television), the store would charge HST at the rate of 13% (5% GST and 8% Ontario HST). The key fact is the place of delivery.

CRA Example: A supplier in Ontario agrees to sell to a purchaser in British Columbia. Based on the terms of delivery in the agreement for the supply of goods, legal delivery of the goods to the purchaser occurs in British Columbia.

CRA Position: The CRA takes the position that because legal delivery of the goods to the purchaser occurs in British Columbia, the supply of the goods is made in British Columbia and the supply will be subject to HST a rate of 12%.

CRA Example: A retailer in Ontario sells goods to a purchaser that is a resident of British Columbia and is visiting Ontario. The purchaser picks up the goods at the retailer's premises in Ontario and then transports the goods to British Columbia.

CRA Position: The goods are delivered to the purchaser in Ontario. The supply of goods is therefore made in Ontario and is proposed to be subject to HST at a rate of 13%.

Rule #2: A supply of goods by way of sale is deemed to be made inside the HST Zone (British Columbia, Ontario, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador) if the legal delivery of the goods is made in that province. For the purposes of this rule, goods are deemed to be delivered in the HST Zone, and not outside the HST Zone, if the supplier either:

  • (a) ships the property to a destination in the HST Zone that is specified in the contract for shipment of the goods;
  • (b) transfers possession of the goods to a common carrier or consignee that the supplier has retained on behalf of the recipient (Buyer) to ship the goods to a destination in the HST Zone; or
  • (c) sends the goods by mail or courier to an address in the HST Zone.

Pursuant to this rule, Incoterms, such as F.O.B. (freight or board) or C.I.F. (cost, insurance freight) are important if the location stated is within the HST Zone.

CRA Example: A supplier in Alberta agrees to sell goods to a purchaser in Ontario. Based on the terms in the agreement for the supply of the goods, legal delivery of the goods to the purchaser occurs in Alberta. However, the supplier agrees to have the goods shipped to the purchaser in Ontario.

CRA Position: Although legal delivery of the goods to the purchaser occurs in Alberta, delivery of the goods to the purchaser is deemed to occur in Ontario because the supplier ships the goods to Ontario. The supply of goods is therefore made in Ontario and is proposed to be subject to HST at a rate of 13%.

CRA Example: A mail-order company located in Nova Scotia sells greeting cards to customers across Canada. The company places the packages of greeting cards in the mail for delivery to customers in Ontario and British Columbia.

CRA Position: The supply of greeting cards mailed to Ontario is made in Ontario and is proposed to be subject to HST at a rate of 13%. The supply of greeting cards mailed to British Columbia is made in British Columbia and is proposed to be subject to HST at a rate of 12%.

Rule #3: Where a recipient of a supply of goods by way of lease, license or similar arrangement (Lessee) subsequently exercises an option to purchase the goods, the recipient lessee is deemed to take delivery by way of sale at the time and place at which the recipient lessee ceased to have possession of the property as a lessee and begins to have possession of the property as a purchaser. The key fact is the location of the goods at the time the option to purchase is exercised.

For example, if a person in Ontario leases a piece of manufacturing equipment from a lessor in Quebec and exercises an option to purchase the equipment at a late date when the equipment is in Ontario, HST will be applicable at a rate of 13% in respect of the option price.

The rate of HST will depend on which HST Zone province is the destination.

Rule #4: Where a supply of goods is made by way of lease, license or similar arrangement (other than a specified motor vehicle) (e.g. an equipment lease) for consideration that is attributed to a period (referred to as a "lease interval") and the lease, license or similar arrangement exceeds three months, the supply is deemed to be made in the HST Zone if the ordinary location of the property is within the HST Zone.

For the purposes of the place of supply rules, the ordinary location of the property is deemed to be the location where the supplier and the recipient mutually agree. This is a concession because the supplier may not be in the best position to know where the recipient has the goods. The CRA states that, "In other words, the mutual agreement of the supplier and the recipient will be determinative even where the property is actually located in a different place at the relevant time than what had been agreed upon."

The CRA will look to the contract and any subsequent amendments to agreements to determine the location of the leased goods.

A separate supply of the goods is deemed to be made for each lease interval of the earliest of the first day of the lease interval, the day on which the lease payment attributable to the lease interval becomes due and the day the payment is made.

Rule #5: Where a supply of goods is made by way of lease, license or similar arrangement (other than a specified motor vehicle) (e.g. an equipment lease) and the lease, license or similar arrangement does not exceed three months, the supply is deemed to be made in province in which the supplier delivers the goods or makes the goods available to the recipient. For the purposes of this rule, goods are deemed to be delivered in the HST Zone, and not outside the HST Zone, if the supplier either:

  • (a) ships the property to a destination in the HST Zone that is specified in the contract for shipment of the goods;
  • (b) transfers possession of the goods to a common carrier or consignee that the supplier has retained on behalf of the recipient (Buyer) to ship the goods to a destination in the HST Zone; or
  • (c) sends the goods by mail or courier to an address in the HST Zone.

Make An HST CheckList

Harmonized Sales Tax (“HST") will become a reality in Ontario and British Columbia on July 1, 2010. However, some businesses will be required to start collecting HST on May 1, 2010. In addition, some businesses outside the HST Zone ( HST Zone = Ontario, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland/Labrador) will also be required to charge collect and remit HST to the Federal Government in accordance with the place of supply rules when the place of supply is within the HST Zone.

It is time to make a “To-Do" list to get ready for HST. The Canadian Federation of Independent Businesses (CFIB) has released an HST checklist this week.

The CFIB list applies for businesses with gross revenues less than $10 million. This is not limited to corporations, trusts, partnerships or sole proprietorships, it also includes family of businesses that are related to each other as the threshold test would be applicable to persons and their related entities.

The checklist below builds on the CFIB list is as follows:

  • Formulate an internal committee of persons who will oversee the HST conversion - the group includes more than top management and the tax specialist/chief financial officer. Plan to meet weekly and prepare checklists.
  • Calculate a budget to address HST conversion issues, including information technology programmers to update your systems and advisors on HST.
  • Contact the persons in your business responsible for information technology as they will be on the front-lines in updating your computer systems.
  • Conduct a sales side audit and determine whether the supplies made by your business are subject to HST. Your business may be required to charge HST on goods that were not subject to retail sales tax.
  • Update sales equipment (e.g. cash registers) and computer systems in order to properly charge HST.
  • Ensure your invoices properly state whether HST is applicable, the HST rate, your GST/HST registration number, and all other information required by the input tax credit regulations.
  • Consider whether your business may offer point of sale rebates and make adjustments to record-keeping.
  • Conduct a purchase side audit and determine whether your purchases are subject to HST. HST will affect what you sell and what you buy. Purchase exemption certificates will no longer be usable when your business buys what were previously RST exempt goods, such as goods that are purchased to be resupplied.
  • Determine your largest expense items and review your largest contracts to determine what will change with the implementation of HST.
  • Identify which suppliers to your business may not be sophisticated enough about HST and ensure they charge the correct amount of HST. Since the Canada Revenue Agency may assess both suppliers and recipients, purchasers have a duty to check the invoicing of their suppliers.
  • Consider whether HST will affect your cash flow and make arrangements for credit. Commercial rent, inventory, electricity, production equipment & machinery, goods purchased for resupply, custom computer software, etc will be subject to HST (and was not subject to RST).
  • Review the transition rules to see when you must start to collect HST or pay HST and when you must self-assess HST.  It can be as early as May 1, 2010.
  • Determine whether the restricted ITC rules apply to your business/related businesses. If your business is over the $10 million threshold, you will not be able to recover HST paid on certain purchases for the first three years of HST. You will be required to set up accounting records to track and report restricted input tax credits on a province-by-province basis. The reporting on HST returns will start on July 2010 GST/HST return, which must be filed electronically.
  • Determine whether you are required to file GST/HST returns electronically, what method of filing electronically your business must use and make arrangements to be able to file electronically starting in July 2010.
  • Determine whether the place of supply rules require your business to charge HST. If your business operates in more than one province, the assessment must be made on a province-by-province and supply-by-supply basis.
  • Set up accounting records for each applicable HST province.
  • Establish internal policies and procedures to ensure HST is properly charged
  • Prepare written materials for sales staff to follow and train your staff on HST.
  • Update sales equipment so that HST is charged at the point of sale.
  • Update computerized payments so that HST is charged where applicable. In some cases, computer programs will need to be rewritten/updated so that the place of delivery (e.g. goods) is reviewed in determining whether HST is applicable.
  • Adjust online payment software or web interfaces used for selling via the Internet (or receiving payments for services and intangibles via the Internet) to reflect the applicable HST rates.
  • Update the information communicated on websites.
  • Prepare and publish new written materials if the publications include information on sales taxes charged.
  • Update internal computer/record keeping, record keeping on input tax credit claims, rebates, refunds, etc., accounts payable record keeping, accounting records on meals and entertainment expenses and taxable benefit calculations.
  • Update internal reports - e.g., expense reports spreadsheets, employee cars, inter company transactions, etc..
  • Determine whether your business must pay HST on imported goods, services and/or intangible property.
  • Determine whether any inter company payments are subject to HST and make adjustments to records and expectations.
  • Take steps to ensure that the business stops collecting retail sales tax/social services tax on July 1, 2010 and that the final returns are prepared
  • Prepare PST/RST/SST records to be audited as both Ontario and British Columbia have said they plan to conduct four years of audits in the next two years.
  • Consider whether the job descriptions of employees need to be updated to reflect HST responsibilities.
  • Public relations - consider whether you need to educate your customers about HST.

This list is not all-inclusive.

New GST/HST Electronic Filing Requirements Announced

To little fanfare and no media attention, on January 4, 2010, The Honourable Jean-Pierre Blackburn, Minister of National Revenue and Minister of State (Agriculture and Agri-Food) announced proposed changes to electronic filing requirements for goods and services tax/harmonized sales tax (GST/HST) registrants beginning July 1, 2010.

The reason for the electronic filing requirements is that the Canada Revenue Agency needs to gather information so that the Department of Finance can communicate information to Ontario and British Columbia pursuant to the CITCAs (a.k.a. HST Agreements).

Currently, only GST/HST registrants who meet the criteria set by the Minister of National Revenue have the option to use electronic filing. As a result of the proposed changes, restrictions will be removed so that all registrants, including those registrants that file a return with Revenu Québec, will be able to file electronically.

Under the new proposed measures, the following groups will be required to file their GST/HST returns electronically:

  • GST/HST registrants with greater than $1.5 million in annual taxable supplies (except for charities); or
  • all registrants required to recapture input tax credits for the provincial portion of the HST on certain inputs in Ontario or British Columbia; or
  • builders affected by the transitional housing measures announced by Ontario or British Columbia.

In general, charities and most GST/HST registrants with annual taxable supplies of $1.5 million or less will not be affected by these changes, although the CRA is encouraging all GST/HST registrants, regardless of their filing frequency and reporting requirements, to use electronic services.

Regulations specifying the persons and classes of persons who will be required to file an electronic return will be available soon (government has been prorogued).

The CRA will offer several electronic filing options for GST/HST registrants. However, many registrants will not have an option and will be forced to use a particular electronic filing method.

  • GST/HST NETFILE
    • Netfile is a free Internet-based filing service that allows registrants to file their returns directly to the CRA over the Internet. To file using GST/HST NETFILE, registrants complete an online form, enter the required information and confirm that they want to file their return. Once the registrant hits <submit></submit></submit><//submit>a confirmation page will immediately be displayed containing the six-digit confirmation number.
    • It is proposed that the following GST/HST registrants would be required to file an electronic return using GST/HST NETFILE effective for the first reporting period that ends on or after July 1, 2010:
    • any registrants that are required to recapture ITCs on the provincial portion of the HST on certain inputs in Ontario or British Columbia (see below); and
    • builders that
      • make sales of grandparented housing where the purchaser is not entitled to claim a GST/HST new housing rebate or new residential rental property rebate;
      • make sales of housing that are subject to the HST where the builder purchased the housing on a grandparented basis;
      • are required to report a transitional tax adjustment amount; or
      • report provincial transitional new housing rebates (see below).
    • In conjunction with these proposed new filing requirements, the CRA will include new information fields on the GST/HST NETFILE return for these registrants.

  • GST/HST TELEFILE
    • Telefile allows eligible registrants to file their GST/HST returns using their touch-tone telephone and a toll-free number.
    • It is also proposed that each builder having greater than $1.5 million in annual taxable supplies that is not otherwise required to file using GST/HST NETFILE and that pays or credits a GST/HST new housing rebate amount to the purchaser and claims that amount as a deduction from the builder’s GST/HST liability would be required to file an electronic return using GST/HST NETFILE or GST/HST TELEFILE effective for the first reporting period that ends on or after July 1, 2010.

    • As a result of the proposed changes, the CRA will include new information fields on the GST/HST NETFILE and GST/HST TELEFILE returns for these registrants.

  • Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
    • EDI is a computer-to-computer exchange of information in a standard format. Eligible registrants can use EDI to file their GST/HST returns and remit their GST/HST payments electronically.
  • GST/HST Internet File Transfer (GIFT)
    • GIFT is a new option that allows eligible registrants to utilize third-party CRA certified accounting software to file their returns electronically.
    • It is also proposed that all GST/HST registrants, other than those required to file using GST/HST NETFILE or GST/HST TELEFILE and with greater than $1.5 million in annual taxable supplies, excluding charities, would be required to file an electronic return using GST/HST NETFILE, GST/HST TELEFILE, EDI or GIFT effective for the first reporting period that ends on or after July 1, 2010.

The CRA provides the following chart:

 

 

Type of Business Filing Options

Businesses that:
a) are required to recapture ITCs for the provincial portion of the HST on certain inputs in Ontario or British Columbia; or
b) are builders who sell grandparented housing where the purchaser is not entitled to claim a GST/HST new housing rebate or new residential rental property rebate; or
c) are builders who sell housing subject to the HST where the builder purchased that housing on a grandparented basis; or
d) are builders who are required to remit the transitional tax adjustment on housing; or
e) are builders who are reporting provincial transitional new housing rebates.

GST/HST NETFILE

Unless required to file using GST/HST NETFILE, builders with greater than $1.5 million in annual taxable supplies that pay or credit a GST/HST new housing rebate amount to the purchaser and claim that amount as a deduction from their GST/HST liability.

GST/HST NETFILE
GST/HST TELEFILE

Businesses that are not required to file using GST/HST NETFILE or GST/HST TELEFILE and with annual taxable supplies exceeding $1.5 million, excluding charities.

GST/HST NETFILE
GST/HST TELEFILE
GIFT
EDI

All other businesses.

GST/HST NETFILE
GST/HST TELEFILE
GIFT
EDI
Paper Return

The businesses that I have spoken with suggest that there are complications that need to be considered.  It is necessary to communicate with the Canada Revenue Agency if there are any problems so that notes can be made in your file and accommodations can be discussed.